UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:
	Preliminary Proxy Statement.Statement.
	Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)).
	Definitive Proxy Statement.
	Definitive Additional Materials.
	Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12.

COLFAX CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
	No fee required.
	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
	(1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
	(2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
	(3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
	(4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
	(5)	Total fee paid:
	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
	(1)	Amount Previously Paid:
	(2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
	(3)	Filing Party:
	(4)	Date Filed:

Proxy Statement
and
Notice of Annual Meeting
May 18, 2017 at 3 pm

	Notice of 20172019
	Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Thursday, May 18, 2017

Monday, May 13, 2019

3:00 p.m. Local Time

Maryland Conference Center, 2720 Technology Drive,
Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701

To Our Stockholders:

Notice is hereby given that the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Colfax Corporation will be held at the Maryland Conference Center located at 2720 Technology Drive, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701 on Thursday,Monday, May 18, 201713, 2019 at 3:00 p.m., local time, for the following purposes:

The accompanying proxy statement describes the matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 22, 201726, 2019 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.

We are pleased to take advantage of the Securities and Exchange Commission rules that allow us to furnish our proxy materials and our annual report to stockholders on the Internet. We believe that posting these materials on the Internet enables us to provide our stockholders with the information that they need more quickly while lowering our costs of printing and delivery and reducing the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting.

As a stockholder of Colfax, your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, we urge you to vote your shares at your earliest convenience and thank you for your continued support of Colfax Corporation.

Dated: April 4, 20172, 2019

By Order of the Board of Directors

A. Lynne PuckettCurtis E. Jewell

Secretary

Table of Contents

- 2017 Proxy Statement	3

- 2017 Proxy Statement	4

PROXY SUMMARY

 

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting. Page references are supplied to help you find further information in this proxy statement.

 

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

 

Date and Time:	Thursday,Monday, May 18, 201713, 2019 at 3:00 pm EDT
Location:	2720 Technology Drive, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701
Record Date:	March 22, 201726, 2019

 

Availability of Proxy Materials – Use of Notice and Access

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to be Held on May 18, 2017:13, 2019: Our Annual Report to Stockholders and this Proxy Statement are available atwww.proxyvote.com.www.proxyvote.com.

 

Pursuant to the “notice and access” rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have elected to provide stockholders access to our proxy materials primarily over the Internet. Accordingly, on or about April 4, 2017,2, 2019, we sent a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to our stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting as of the close of business on March 22, 2017,26, 2019, the record date of the meeting. The Notice includes instructions on how to access our proxy materials over the Internet and how to request a printed copy of these materials. In addition, by following the instructions in the Notice, stockholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail on an ongoing basis.

 

Choosing to receive your future proxy materials by e-mail will save us the cost of printing and mailing documents to you and will reduce the impact of our annual meetings on the environment. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by e-mail, you will receive an e-mail next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by e-mail will remain in effect until you terminate it.

 

Who May Vote

 

You may vote if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on the March 22, 2017,26, 2019, the record date.

 

How to Cast Your Vote

 

You can vote by any of the following methods:

 

	Via the internet (www.proxyvote.com) though May 17, 2017;12, 2019;
	By telephone (1-800-690-6903) though May 17, 2017;12, 2019;
	By completing, signing and returning your proxy by mail in the envelope provided or to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NJ 1121711717 by May 17, 2017;12, 2019; or
	Via in person attendance and voting at the Annual Meeting. If you are a stockholder of record, your admission card will serve as proof of ownership. If you hold your shares through a bank, broker nominee or other intermediary,nominee, you must bring proof of ownership.ownership and, to vote, a valid legal proxy from a stockholder of record.

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	5

Voting Matters

 

We are asking you to vote on the following proposals at the Annual Meeting:

 

Proposal		Board Vote Recommendation		Page Reference
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors		FOR each director nominee		9
Proposal 2 – Approval of AuditorsAuditor		FOR		20
Proposal 3 – Say-on-Pay		FOR		47
Proposal 4 – Say-on-Frequency		ONE YEAR		48

 

Board and Governance Highlights

 

■	Balanced Board tenure with new independent directordirectors appointed in 2017 and 2016
■	Two-thirdsOver three-fourths (75%) independent Board with two female directors
■	Stock ownership requirements for officers and directors
■	Anti-hedging, anti-pledging, and clawback policies

 

Board Nominees (page 10)

 

The following table provides summary information about each director nominee:

 

Director

Committee

Name

Age

Director Since

Occupation

Independent

Committee Memberships

Other Public Boards

Age

Since

Occupation

Independent

Memberships

Other Public Boards

Mitchell P. Rales

60

1995

Chairman of the Board, Colfax Corporation Chairman of the Executive Committee, Danaher Corporation

N/A

Danaher Corporation Fortive Corporation

62

1995

Chairman of the Board, Colfax Corporation

N/A

Danaher Corporation; Fortive Corporation

Chairman of the Executive Committee, Danaher Corporation

Matthew L. Trerotola

49

2015

President and Chief Executive Officer, Colfax Corporation

N/A

None

51

2015

President and Chief Executive Officer, Colfax Corporation

N/A

None

Patrick W. Allender

70

2008

Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Danaher Corporation

Nominating (Chair) Audit

Brady Corporation Diebold, Incorporated

72

2008

Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Danaher Corporation

Nominating (Chair) Audit

Brady Corporation; Diebold Nixdorf, Inc.

Thomas S. Gayner

55

2008

Co-Chief Executive Officer, Markel Corporation

Audit

Markel Corporation Cable One, Inc. Graham Holdings, Inc.

57

2008

Co-Chief Executive Officer, Markel Corporation

Audit

Markel Corporation; Cable One, Inc.; Graham Holdings, Inc.

Rhonda L. Jordan

59

2009

Former President, Kraft

Compensation (Chair) Nominating

Ingredion, Inc.

61

2009

Former President, Kraft Foods Inc.

Compensation (Chair) Nominating

Ingredion, Inc.

San W. Orr, III

47

2012

Partner & Chief Operating Officer, BDT Capital Partners

N/A

None

A. Clayton Perfall

58

2010

Operating Executive, Tailwind Capital

Audit (Chair)

Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.

60

2010

Operating Executive, Tailwind Capital

Audit (Chair)

None

Didier Teirlinck

62

2017

Former Executive Vice President, Climate Segment, Ingersoll Rand

Audit

None

Rajiv Vinnakota

45

2008

Executive Vice-President, Aspen Institute

Compensation Nominating

None

48

2008

President, Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation, effective July 1, 2019

Compensation Nominating

None

Sharon Wienbar

55

2016

Venture Partner, Scale Venture Partners

Compensation

None

57

2016

Former Venture Partner, Scale Venture Partners

Compensation

Resideo Technologies, Inc.

 

In accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), to be elected each director nominee must receive a majority of the votes cast with respect to that director’s election. Incumbent directors nominated for election by the Board are required, as a condition to such nomination, to submit a conditional letter of resignation to the Chairman of the Board. In the event that a nominee for director does not receive a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting with respect to his or her election, the Board will promptly consider whether to accept or reject the conditional resignation of that nominee, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will then take action and will publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it no later than 90 days following the certification of election results.

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	6

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	7

Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Stockholders

20172019 Annual Meeting

We are furnishing this Proxy Statement (the “Proxy Statement”) in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Colfax Corporation (hereinafter, “Colfax,” “we,” “us” and the “Company”) of proxies for use at the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Thursday,Monday, May 18, 2017,13, 2019, at 3:00 p.m. local time, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. The Board has made this Proxy Statement and the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting available on the Internet. We first made these materials available to the Company’s stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting on or about April 4, 2017.2, 2019.

About Colfax Corporation

Colfax Corporation is a leading global manufacturing and engineeringdiversified technology company that provides gas and fluid handling andorthopedic, fabrication technology and air and gas handling products and services to commercial and governmental customers around the world throughprincipally under the Howden,DJO, ESAB, and Colfax Fluid Handling businesses.Howden brands. Our business has been built through a series of acquisitions, as well as organic growth, since its founding in 1995.

Our January 2012 acquisition of Charter International plc transformed Colfax from a fluid handling business into a diversified industrial enterprise with a broad global footprint that encompassed fabrication technology (operating primarily under the ESAB brand name), fluid handling products, and air and gas handling products (operating principally under the Howden brand name). In the years following that acquisition, we completed 24 acquisitions to grow and strengthen our business across our three major business lines. In December 2017, we completed the divestiture of our fluid handling business. This represented a strategic milestone in the development and transformation of our business portfolio and strengthened our balance sheet, providing more flexibility to execute our strategic growth strategy. In November 2018, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire DJO Global Inc. (“DJO”) for $3.2 billion in cash. DJO is a global developer, manufacturer and distributor of high-quality medical devices with a broad range of products used for orthopedic bracing, reconstructive implants, rehabilitation, pain management and physical therapy. This acquisition was completed in February 2019. We intend to continue to acquire attractive businesses that we believe will strengthen the core of our business and/or broaden and diversify our portfolio.

As discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K, we seek to build an enduring premier global enterprise by applying the Colfax Business System (“CBS”) to pursue growth in revenues and improvements in profit and cash flow. To operate our businesses, we employ a comprehensive set of tools that we refer to as CBS. CBS is our business management system. It is a repeatable, teachable process that we use to create superior value for our customers, stockholders, and associates. Rooted in our core values, it is our culture. CBS provides the tools and techniques to ensure that we are continuously improving our ability to meet or exceed customer requirements on a consistent basis.

Our principal executive office is located at 420 National Business Parkway, 5^thFloor, Annapolis Junction, MD, 20777. Our telephone number is (301) 323-9000 and our website is located atwww.colfaxcorp.com.Our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol CFX.

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	8

Nine director nominees will be elected at the Annual Meeting, each to serve until the next annual meeting of the Company and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. At the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board has nominated the following persons to serve as directors for the term beginning at the Annual Meeting on May 18, 2017:13, 2019: Mitchell P. Rales, Matthew L. Trerotola, Patrick W. Allender, Thomas S. Gayner, Rhonda L. Jordan, San W. Orr, III, A. Clayton Perfall, Didier Teirlinck, Rajiv Vinnakota, and Sharon Wienbar. All nominees are currently serving on the Board.

Director Qualifications

Nominating Committee Criteria for Board Members

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers, among other things, the following criteria in selecting and reviewing director nominees:

Pursuant to its charter, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also reviews, among other qualifications, the perspective, broad business judgment and leadership, business creativity and vision, and diversity of potential directors, all in the context of the needs of the Board at that time. We believe that Board membership should reflect diversity in its broadest sense, including persons diverse in geography, gender, and ethnicity, and we seek independent directors who represent a mix of backgrounds and experiences that will enhance the quality of the Board’s deliberations and decisions.

The charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee affirmatively recognizes diversity as one of the criteria for consideration in the selection of director nominees, and in its deliberations and discussions concerning potential director appointments the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has paid particular attention to diversity together with all other qualifying attributes. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually considers its effectiveness in achieving these objectives as a part of its assessment of the overall composition of the Board.Board and as part of the annual Board evaluation process described further below, which includes a director skills matrix to identify areas of director knowledge and experience that may benefit the Board in the future. That information is used as a part of the director search and nomination process. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee looks for candidates with the expertise, skills, knowledge and experience that, when taken together with that of other members of the Board, will lead to a Board that is effective, collegial and responsive to the needs of the Company. As further discussed below, certain members of our Board have experience with the business systems that are an integral part of our Company culture. In addition, we feel that the familiarity of certain Board members with our business system from their work experiences at Danaher Corporation and at our Company, combined with strong input from varied and sophisticated business backgrounds, provides us with a Board that is both functional and collegial while able to draw on a broad range of expertise in the consideration of complex issues.

Board Member Service

The biographies of each of the nominees below contain information regarding the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board considered in determining that the person should serve as a director of the Company. The Board has been informed that all of the nominees listed below are willing to serve as directors, but if any of them should decline or be unable to act as a director, the individuals named in the proxies may vote for a substitute designated by the Board. The Company has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable or unwilling to serve.

In determining to nominate Mr. Gayner for re-election, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board carefully evaluated and took into account that Mr. Gayner serves as an executive officer at Markel Corporation and serves on the boards of Markel Corporation, Graham Holdings Co. and Cable One Inc. (which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Graham Holdings until July 2015). The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determined, and the Board concurred, that Mr. Gayner is a valuable, productive and fully engaged director who should be re-elected to the Board. In reaching this conclusion, the Nominating and Governance Corporate Committee took note of Mr. Gayner’s stellar attendance record and role on our Board (Mr. Gayner attended all meetings of the Board and the Committees’ on which he served during 20162018 and is an active participant in all Colfax Board matters), that Mr. Gayner is well-prepared for and participates actively in Board and Committee meetings, and that he brings unique experience and vision to our Board as a preeminent value investor and strategic leader from his position at Markel. Further, as of the end of 2016, Mr. Gayner is no longer serving on our Compensation Committee but remains an active member of our Audit Committee. Based on these factors, Mr. Gayner was unanimously recommended and re-nominated for election to our Board of Directors.

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	9

Nominees for Director

The names of the nominees for director, their ages as of March 22, 2017,26, 2019, principal occupations, employment and other public company board service during at least the last five years, periods of service as a director of the Company, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills of each nominee are set forth below:

MITCHELL P. RALES

Director Since 1995

Age 6062

Mitchell P. Ralesis a co-founder of Colfax and has served as a director of the Company since its founding in 1995. He is the Chairman of our Board of Directors. Mr. Rales is a co-founder and has served as a member of the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of Danaher Corporation, a global science and technology company, since 1983 and as Chairman of Danaher’s Executive Committee since 1984, and is also a member of the Fortive Corporation Boardboard of Directors,directors, which is a diversified industrial growth company that was spun-off from Danaher in 2016. He has been a principal in a number of private business entities with interests in manufacturing companies and publicly traded securities for over 25 years. Mr. Rales was instrumental in the founding of our Company and has played a key leadership role on our Board since that time. He helped create the Danaher Business System, on which the Colfax Business System is modeled, and has provided critical strategic guidance to the Company during its development and growth. In addition, as a result of Mr. Rales’Rales��� substantial ownership stake in our Company, he is well-positioned to understand, articulate and advocate for the rights and interests of the Company’s stockholders.

MATTHEW L. TREROTOLA

Director Since 2015

Age 4951

Matthew L. Trerotolahas been our President and Chief Executive Office and has served as a director of the Company since July 2015. Prior to joining Colfax, Mr. Trerotola was an Executive Vice President and a member of DuPont’s Office of the Chief Executive, responsible for DuPont’s Electronics & Communications and Safety & Protection segments. Mr. Trerotola also had corporate responsibility for DuPont’s Asia-Pacific business. Many of Mr. Trerotola’s roles at DuPont, a global chemical company that is now part of DowDupont, involved applying innovation to improve margins and accelerate organic growth in global businesses. Prior to rejoining DuPont in 2013, Mr. Trerotola had served in leadership roles at Danaher since 2007, and was most recently Vice President and Group Executive for Life Sciences. Previously, Mr. Trerotola was Group Executive for Product Identification from 2009 to 2012, and President of the Videojet business from 2007 to 2009. While at McKinsey & Company from 1995 to 1999, Mr. Trerotola focused primarily on helping industrial companies accelerate growth. Mr. Trerotola’s day-to-day leadership of Colfax, combined with his significant international business experience and familiarity with the Danaher Business System, gives the Board an invaluable Company-focused perspective supplemented by his global operational expertise.

PATRICK W. ALLENDER

Director Since 2008

Age 7072

Patrick W. Allenderhas served as a director of the Company since May 13, 2008. He is the former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Danaher Corporation, where he served from 1987 until his retirement in 2007. Prior to joining Danaher, Mr. Allender was an audit partner with a large international accounting firm. Mr. Allender is a director of Brady Corporation, where he is a member of the audit and corporate governance committees and the chairman of the finance committee, and a director of Diebold Nixdorf, Inc., where he is a member of the board finance committee and chairman of the audit committee. Mr. Allender’s prior experience as the Chief Financial Officer of a publicly traded company provides him with substantial expertise in financial reporting and risk management. In addition, his familiarity with the Danaher Business System provides targeted insight on the nature of the Company’s operations to the Board.

THOMAS S. GAYNER

Director Since 2008

Age 5557

Thomas S. Gaynerhas served as a director of the Company since May 13, 2008. He is Co-Chief Executive Officer of Markel Corporation, a financial holding company whose principal business markets and underwrites specialty insurance products. Since 1990, Mr. Gayner has served as President of Markel Gayner Asset Management, Inc. Mr. Gayner has served as a director of Markel Corporation since August 2016 and previously served on the Markel Corporation Boardboard from 1998 to 2003. Mr. Gayner also currently serves on the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of Graham Holdings Company and Cable One, Inc, as well as a director of The Davis Series Funds. Through his experience and investment knowledge with the Markel Corporation as well as his service on the boards and committees of other publicly traded companies, Mr. Gayner brings extensive leadership, financial acumen and public company expertise to our Board.

RHONDA L. JORDAN

Director Since 2009

Age 5961

Rhonda L. Jordanhas served as a director of the Company since February 17, 2009. She served as President, Global Health & Wellness, and Sustainability for Kraft Foods Inc. until 2012 and in that role led the development of Kraft’s health & wellness and sustainability strategies and plans for the company, including marketing, product development, technology, alliances and acquisitions. Prior to being named President, Health & Wellness in 2010, she was the President of the Cheese and Dairy business

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	10

unit of Kraft. From 2006 to 2008 she served as the President of the Grocery business unit of Kraft and from 2004 to 2005 she was the Senior Vice President, Global Marketing of Kraft Cheese and Dairy. Ms. Jordan is a director of Ingredion Incorporated, where she is a memberchair of the compensation committee, and ofthe private companies Bush Brothers & Company.Company and G&L Holdings. Ms. Jordan’s management and operations experience within a large, global corporation gives her an important strategic voice in Board deliberations, and her knowledge and decision making with respect to business unit development and sustainable top-line performance makes her a valued member of our Board.

SAN W. ORR, III

Director Since 2012

Age 47

San W. Orr, III has served as a director of the Company since February 22, 2012. He is Partner & Chief Operating Officer of the investment firm BDT Capital Partners, LLC, a position he has held since 2011. Prior to joining BDT Capital in 2009, Mr. Orr spent over ten years at Goldman, Sachs & Co. in several positions, including Managing Director, GS Direct, Investment Banking Division, where he advised clients and led transaction teams on mergers and acquisitions, equity, convertible and debt financings. Mr. Orr’s background also includes public accounting experience as well as bankruptcy, corporate and securities and finance and tax law. Mr. Orr’s investment and transactional experience, as well as his vested interest as a director-nominee and Partner of a substantial Company stockholder, BDT Capital, adds both talent and further stockholder representation to our Board.

A. CLAYTON PERFALL

Director Since 2010

Age 5860

A. Clayton Perfallhas served as a director of the Company since September 21, 2010. He is currently an Operating Executive of Tailwind Capital, a private equity fund manager focused on growing middle market companies in the healthcare and business & communications services sectors. He previously served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Archway Marketing Services, Inc., a provider of marketing logistics and fulfillment services, from 2008 through 2013. From 2001 until 2008 Mr. Perfall served as the Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of AHL Services, Inc. Mr. Perfall also served as the Chief Executive Officer of Union Street Acquisition Corp. from 2006 until 2008. He served as the Chief Financial Officer of Snyder Communications, Inc. from 1996 until 2000 and was previously a partner with a large international accounting firm. Mr. Perfall currently serves on the Boardsboards of Directorsdirectors of the private companies Tailwind Premier Holdings, LLC and Distinct Holdings Group, LLC and Comstock Holding Companies, Inc., and previously served on the Boardsboards of Directorsdirectors of Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. from 2004 to 2018 Archway Marketing Services, Inc. from 2008 until 2013, RT Acquisition Corp. from 2012 until 2015 and inVentiv Health, Inc. from 1999 to 2010. He is currentlyserved as the audit committee chairman for Comstock Homebuilding Companies, Inc. and served as the chair of the audit committeeInVentiv Health during his time on the board of inVentiv Health.those boards. Mr. Perfall’s significant financial expertise and experience as an audit committee chairman and public company Chief Financial Officer, combined with his substantial executive leadership background, are assets to both our Board and our Audit Committee.

DIDIER TEIRLINCK

Director Since 2017
Age 62

Didier Teirlinckhas served as a director of the Company since September 18, 2017. He retired from rom Ingersoll Rand, a diversified industrial manufacturing company, in September 2018. He has been a strategic advisor to the CEO of Ingersoll Rand since 2017, and previously served from November 2013 as executive vice president for Ingersoll Rand’s Climate segment, overseeing climate businesses around the world and enhancing competitive position and market share. After joining Ingersoll Rand in 2005, Mr. Teirlinck served as president of Climate Control in Europe before becoming President of the global Climate Solutions sector in 2009. Before joining Ingersoll Rand, he was President of Volvo Construction Equipment’s Compact Business Line worldwide and was previously general manager of DANISCO Flexible Group for southern Europe. Mr. Teirlinck’s international operating history and wealth of knowledge in the climate sector brings key geographic and market experience to our Board.

RAJIV VINNAKOTA

Director Since 2008

Age 4548

Rajiv Vinnakotahas served as a director of the Company since May 13, 2008. He iswill be the President of the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation, effective July 1, 2019. From 2015 to September 2018 he was an Executive Vice-President at the Aspen Institute, leading a new division focused on youth & engagement. Prior to this new role, Mr. Vinnakota was the Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer of The SEED Foundation, a non-profit educational organization, at which he served from 1997-2015. Mr. Vinnakota was the chairman of The SEED Foundation board from 1997 until 2006. Prior to co-founding SEED, Mr. Vinnakota was an associate at Mercer Management Consulting. He was also a trustee of Princeton University from 2004 until 2007 and a member of the Executive Committee of the Princeton University Boardboard of Directorsdirectors from 2006 to 2007, and he served as the national chairman of Annual Giving at Princeton from 2007 until 2009. Mr. Vinnakota’s management experience, combined with his experience in the non-profit sector, brings a valuable perspective to our Board.

SHARON WIENBAR

Director Since 2016

Age 5557

Sharon Wienbarhas served as a director of the Company since June 15, 2016. She has beenwas previously with Scale Venture Partners, sincea venture capital firm, from 2001 to 2018, where she led investments in technology companies and has served on the board of numerous portfolio businesses. She iswas also a strategy consultant to Capella Education Company after they acquired Hackbright Academy, a leading software engineering training company for women, where she was previously the CEO. SheCEO from 2015-2016. Ms. Wienbar currently serves on the boards of Applause Software Quality, Inc.Resideo Technology, a New York Stock Exchange-listed public company, and Actiance, Inc., privately-held companies in which Scale Venture Partners have invested, andTrue Anthem, a privately held software provider. She previously served on other public and private boards, including the board of Everyday Health, Inc., a New York Stock Exchange-listed public company, until its acquisition in December 2016. Prior to her venture capital career, Ms. Wienbar was an executive in several software companies and a consultant at Bain & Company. Ms. Wienbar’s leadership of technology investments, deep understanding of innovation drivers, and business acumen bring an important perspective to our Board.

VOTE REQUIRED

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast is required for election of each director.

BOARD RECOMMENDATION

The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote“FOR”the election of each of the nominees for director listed above.

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	11

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Director Independence

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that a majority of our Board members be “independent” under the NYSE’s listing standards. In addition, the respective charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee require that each member of these committees be “independent” under the NYSE’s listing standards and, with respect to the Audit Committee, under the applicable SEC rules. In order for a director to qualify as “independent,” our Board must affirmatively determine that the director has no material relationship with the Company that would impair the director’s independence. Our Board undertook its annual review of director independence in February 2017.2019. The Board has determined that Mr. Allender, Mr. Gayner, Ms. Jordan, Mr. Perfall, Mr. Teirlinck, Mr. Vinnakota, and Ms. Wienbar each qualify as “independent” under the NYSE’s listing standards. In reaching a determination on these directors’ independence, the Board considered that neither the directors nor their immediate family members have within the past three years had any direct or indirect business or professional relationships with the Company other than in their capacity as directors.

The independent members of our Board must hold at least two “executive session” meetings each year without the presence of management. If the Chair of the Board is not an independent director, the independent directors select an independent director to serve as Chairperson for each executive session. In general, the meetings of independent directors are intended to be used as a forum to discuss such topics as they deem necessary or appropriate. Mr. Allender serves as the presiding director of the independent director executive sessions and as such leads the independent directors during these sessions.

Board of Directors and its Committees

The Board and its committees meet regularly throughout the year, and may also hold special meetings and act by written consent from time to time. The Board held a total of seventhirteen meetings during the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, including five regularly scheduled meetings and twoeight special meetings. In aggregate, during this time our directors attended over 95% of our Board meetings and meetings of the committees of the Board on which such directors served. During 2016,2018, no director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees of the Board on which such director served. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines request Board members to make every effort to attend our annual meeting of stockholders. All directors then serving attended our annual meeting of stockholders in 2016.2018.

The Board has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The charters for the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are available on the Company’s website atwww.colfaxcorp.comon the Investors page under the Corporate Governance tab. These materials also are available in print to any stockholder upon request to: Corporate Secretary, Colfax Corporation, 420 National Business Parkway, 5^thFloor, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701. The Board committees review their respective charters on an annual basis. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees an annual evaluation of the Board and each committee’s operations and performance.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee met nine times during the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. The Audit Committee is responsible, among its other duties and responsibilities, for overseeing our accounting and financial reporting processes, the audits of our financial statements, the qualifications of our independent registered public accounting firm, and the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee reviews and assesses the qualitative aspects of our financial reporting, our processes to manage business and financial risks, and our compliance with significant applicable legal, ethical and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm. The members of our Audit Committee are Mr. Perfall, Chair, Mr. Allender, Mr. Gayner, and Mr. Gayner.Teirlinck. The Board has determined that each of Mr. Perfall qualifiesand Mr. Allender qualify as an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined under the SEC rules. The Board has determined that each member of our Audit Committee is independent and financially literate under the NYSE’s listing standards and that each member of our Audit Committee is independent under the standards of Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	12

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met elevenfive times during the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for recommending candidates for election to the Board. In making its recommendations, the committee will review a candidate’s qualifications and any potential conflicts of interest and assess contributions of current directors in connection with his or her renomination. The committee is also responsible, among its other duties and responsibilities, for making recommendations to the Board or otherwise acting with respect to corporate governance policies and practices, including Board size and membership qualifications, new director orientation, committee structure and membership, related person transactions, and communications with stockholders and other interested parties. The members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Mr. Allender, Chair, Ms. Jordan and Mr. Vinnakota. The Board has determined that each member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent under the NYSE’s listing standards.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee met eightseven times during the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. The Compensation Committee is responsible, among its other duties and responsibilities, for determining and approving the compensation and benefits of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, monitoring compensation arrangements applicable to our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers in light of their performance, effectiveness and other relevant considerations and adopting and administering our equity and incentive plans. The members of our Compensation Committee are Ms. Jordan, Chair, Mr. Vinnakota, and Ms. Wienbar. The Board has determined that each member of our Compensation Committee is an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, a “non-employee director” within the meaning of SEC Rule 16b-3, and is independent under the NYSE’s listing standards for directors and compensation committee members.

The Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves the corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, evaluates his performance in light of those goals and objectives, and determines his compensation level based on that analysis. The Compensation Committee also annually reviews and approves all elements of the compensation of our other executive officers. Our Chief Executive Officer plays a significant role in developing and assessing achievement against the goals and objectives for other executive officers and makes compensation recommendations to the Compensation Committee based on these evaluations. The Compensation Committee also administers all of the Company’s incentive compensation plans and equity-based compensation plans. The Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board regarding compensation of all executive officer hires, all elements of director compensation, and for adoption or certain amendments to incentive or equity-based compensation plans. The Compensation Committee also assists the Board in its oversight of risk related to the Company’s compensation policies and practices applicable to all Colfax associates. For further information on our compensation practices, including a description of our processes and procedures for determining compensation, the scope of the Compensation Committee’s authority and management’s role in compensation determinations, please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, which begins on page 23.

Since April 2009, our Compensation Committee has engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co. as its independent compensation consultant to, among other things, formulate an appropriate peer group to be used by the Compensation Committee and to provide competitive comparison data and for other compensation consulting services as requested by the Compensation Committee. Additional information on the nature of the information and services provided by this independent compensation consultant can be found below in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of the Compensation Committee is or has ever been an officer or an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, and no Compensation Committee member has any interlocking or insider relationship with the Company which is required to be reported under the rules of the SEC.

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	13

Identification of Director Candidates and Director Nomination Process

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers candidates for Board membership suggested by its members and other Board members, as well as by management and stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also use outside consultants to assist in identifying candidates and during 2016 used third-party recruiters to identify and provide background information on possible candidates. Ms. Wienbar was first recommended to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by a non-management director. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for assessing whether a candidate may qualify as an independent director. Each possible candidate is discussed and evaluated in detail before being recommended to the Board.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends, and the Board nominates, candidates to stand for election as directors. Stockholders may nominate persons to be elected as directors and, as noted above, may suggest candidates for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. If a stockholder wishes to suggest a person to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration as a director candidate, he or she must provide the same information as required of a stockholder who intends to nominate a director pursuant to the procedures contained in Section 3.3 of our Bylaws, in accordance with the same deadlines applicable to director nominations, as described below under “General Matters—Stockholder Proposals and Nominations.”

Board Leadership Structure

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines specify that the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer shall be held by separate persons. We believe that this structure is appropriate given the differences between the two roles in our current management structure. Our Chief Executive Officer, among other duties, is responsible for setting the strategic direction for the Company and the day-to-day leadership and performance of the Company, while the Chairman of our Board, among other responsibilities, provides guidance to the Chief Executive Officer, takes an active role in setting the agenda for Board meetings and presides over meetings of the full Board. Our current Chairman, Mr. Rales, is not an independent director and, as noted above in “Director Independence,” Mr. Allender serves as the presiding director for independent director executive sessions and as such leads the independent directors during these sessions.

Board Evaluation Process

The Board and its Committees conduct self-assessments annually at their February meetings. The Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee oversees the process. The annual evaluation procedure is summarized below.

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	14

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board maintains responsibility for oversight of risks that may affect the Company. The Board discharges this duty primarily through its standing committees and also considers risk in its strategic planning for the Company and in its consideration of acquisitions. The Board engages in discussions about risk at each quarterly meeting, where it receives reports from its committees, as applicable, about the risk oversight activities within their respective areas of responsibility. Specifically, the Audit Committee (i) receives reports from and discusses with management, those performing our internal audit function,team, and our independent registered public accounting firm all major risk exposures (whether financial, operating or otherwise), (ii) reviews the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and enterprise risk management, including with respect to cybersecurity risks, and (iii) oversees compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and our ethics program, including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the corporate governance principles and governance structures that contribute to successful risk oversight and management. The Compensation Committee oversees certain risks associated with compensation policies and practices, as discussed below.

The Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Compensation Committees each make full reports to the Board of Directors at each quarterlyregularly scheduled meeting regarding each committee’s considerations and actions, and risk considerations are presented to and discussed with the Board by management as part of strategic planning sessions and when considering potential acquisitions.

Standards of Conduct

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Pledging

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, which set forth a framework to assist the Board in the exercise of its responsibilities. The Corporate Governance Guidelines cover, among other things, the composition and certain functions of the Board and its committees, executive sessions, Board responsibilities, expectations for directors, director orientation and continuing education, and our policy prohibiting pledging.

In February 2014, the Board amended the Corporate Governance Guidelines to prohibit any future pledging of Colfax’s common stock as security under any obligation by our directors and executive officers. The Board excepted from the policy shares of Colfax common stock that were already pledged at the time the policy was adopted, but any additional share pledges are prohibited. Pledged shares of Colfax common stock do not count toward our stock ownership requirements.

Certain shares of common stock owned by Mitchell Rales, Chairman of our Board, that were exemptedpledged at the time that the policy was adopted were grandfathered from the policy. Notwithstanding that these shares are exempted fromthe existing pledge was grandfathered under our policy, as part of its risk oversight function the Audit Committee of the Board reviews Mr. Rales’ share pledges on a quarterly basis to assess whether such pledging poses an undue risk to the Company. In evaluating Mr. Rales’ pledge of Colfax shares, the Audit Committee considered that Mr. Rales acquired these shares with his own funds in connection with founding the Company and did not receive them as compensation from Colfax; that, as a founder of Colfax and dedicated long-term stockholder, he has (as with many institutional stockholders) pledged a portion of his shares instead of selling shares for liquidity; and that Mr. Rales, as a founder or significant investor in other public companies (including Danaher Corporation and Fortive Corporation), has significant personal assets. In addition to taking into account the number of shares and percentage of outstanding shares pledged, the Audit Committee has also considered the degree of overcollateralization (the amount by which the market value of the shares pledged as collateral exceeds the amount of secured indebtedness), as the Committee believes this is a key factor in assessing the degree of risk posed by the pledging arrangements. Based on its evaluation, the Committee has concluded that the existing pledge arrangements do not pose an undue risk to the Company. The Audit Committee will continue to periodically review the shares pledged as part of its risk oversight function.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

As part of our system of corporate governance, the Board has also adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”), which was amended and restated in 2016, that is applicable to all directors, officers and employees of the Company. The Code of Ethics sets forth Company policies, expectations and procedures on a number of topics, including but not limited to conflicts of interest, compliance with laws, rules and regulations (including insider trading laws), honesty and ethical conduct, and quality. The Code of Ethics also sets forth procedures for reporting violations of the Code and investigations thereof.

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	15

Policies on Insider Trading, Hedging and Stock Ownership

The Company has a Policy on Insider Trading and Compliance which, in addition to mandating compliance with insider trading laws, prohibits any director, officer or employee of the Company from engaging in short sales, transactions in derivative securities (including put and call options), or other forms of hedging and monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars, equity swaps, exchange funds and forward sale contracts, that allow the holder to limit or eliminate the risk of a decrease in the value of the Company’s securities. Further, we have stock ownership policies applicable to our directors and executives to promote alignment of interests between our stockholders, directors and management.

Where to Find Our Key Governance Policies

The Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Ethics are available on the Company’s website atwww.colfaxcorp.comon the Investors page under the Corporate Governance tab. These materials also are available in print to any stockholder upon request to: Corporate Secretary, Colfax Corporation, 420 National Business Parkway, 5^thFloor, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701.

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions

Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions

We have adopted a written Policy Regarding Related Person Transactions pursuant to which our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or a majority of the disinterested members of our Board generally must approve related person transactions in advance. The policy applies to any transaction or series of similar transactions involving more than $120,000 in which the Company is a participant and in which a “related person” has a direct or indirect material interest. “Related persons” include the Company’s directors, nominees for director, executive officers, and greater than 5% stockholders, as well as the immediate family members of the foregoing. In approving or rejecting the proposed transaction, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the proposed related person transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances, the extent of the person’s interest in the transaction and, if applicable, the impact on a director’s independence. Under the policy, if we discover related person transactions that have not been approved, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is to be notified and will determine the appropriate action, including ratification, rescission or amendment of the transaction.

Related Person Transactions

Set forth below is a summary of certain transactions since January 1, 20162018 in which (i) the Company was or is a participant, (ii) any of our directors, executive officers, beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common stock, or the immediate family members of any of the foregoing had or will have a direct or indirect material interest and (iii) the amount involved exceeds or will exceed $120,000:

Transactions with Danaher Corporation

Certain of our subsidiaries purchase products from and sell products to Danaher Corporation (“Danaher”) from time to time in the ordinary course of business and on an arms’-length basis. Such transactions are pre-approved under our Policy Regarding Related Person Transactions. In 2016,2018, our subsidiaries purchased approximately $480,000$118,000 of products from, and sold approximately $25,000$49,000 of products to, Danaher, which is less than 0.02%0.005% of our, and of Danaher’s, gross revenues for 2016.2018. Our subsidiaries intend to purchase products from and sell products to Danaher in the future in the ordinary course of their businesses and on an arms’-length basis.

Mitchell P. Rales is the Chairman of Danaher’s executive committee and Steven M. Rales is the Chairman of Danaher’s Board of Directors, and both are the beneficial owners of at least 5% of Danaher’s outstanding common stock and our outstanding common stock.

Transactions with Fortive Corporation

Certain of our subsidiaries purchase products from and sell products to Fortive Corporation (“Fortive”) from time to time in the ordinary course of business and on an arms’-length basis. Such transactions are pre-approved under our Policy Regarding Related Person Transactions. In 2018, our subsidiaries purchased approximately $287,000 of products from Fortive, which is less than 0.005% of our, and of Fortive’s, gross revenues for 2018. Our subsidiaries intend to purchase products from and sell products to Fortive in the future in the ordinary course of their businesses and on an arms’-length basis. Mitchell P. Rales and Steven M. Rales are each members of Fortive’s Board of Directors, and both are the beneficial owners of at least 5% of Fortive’s outstanding common stock and our outstanding common stock.

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	16

Corporate Social Responsibility

We actively identify and manage environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) considerations that may be material to the long-term sustainability of our business. ESG issues that we focus on across the Company include workplace health and safety, energy efficiency, waste management, climate risk, human capital management, diversity and inclusion, supply chain management, business ethics and compliance, and data privacy and protection.

We take ESG-related risks and opportunities into account in our strategic decision-making, both by the Board and management. ESG matters are managed and monitored by senior management throughout the year. The Board exercises oversight over ESG matters at the full Board level and through our relevant committees.

In 2019 and 2020 we intend to undertake a review of our ESG priorities and programs in connection with a project for the development of a comprehensive business sustainability model. We will be reviewing selected ESG-related policies and procedures, with a focus in part on life-cycle impacts for our products, climate-linked emissions, and resource sustainability. As part of this review and project, we expect to produce and periodically update additional information on our ESG programs, objectives, and accomplishments in future years.

Contacting the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors has established a process for stockholders and interested parties to communicate with the Board and to report complaints or concerns relating to our accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters. Stockholders and interested parties wishing to communicate with our Board may do so by writing to any of the members of the Board, the Chairman of the Board, or the non-management members of the Board as a group, at:

Colfax Corporation

420 National Business Parkway, 5^thFloor

Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701

Attn: Corporate Secretary

Complaints or concerns relating to our accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will be referred to members of the Audit Committee. Other correspondence will be referred to the relevant director or group of directors. Our Policy on Stockholder and Interested Party Communications with the Board of Directors (the “Board Communications Policy”) requires that any stockholder communication to members of the Board prominently display the legend “Board Communication” in order to indicate to the Corporate Secretary that it is communication subject to our policy and will be received and processed by the Corporate Secretary’s office. Each communication received by the Corporate Secretary is copied for our files and promptly forwarded to the addressee. In our Board Communications Policy, the Board has requested that certain items not related to the Board’s duties and responsibilities be excluded from forwarded communications, such as mass mailings and business advertisements. In addition, the Corporate Secretary is not required to forward any communication that the Corporate Secretary, in good faith, determines to be frivolous, unduly hostile, threatening, illegal or similarly unsuitable. However, the Corporate Secretary maintains a list of each communication subject to this policy that is not forwarded, and on a quarterly basis delivers the list to the Chairman of the Board. In addition, each communication subject to this policy that is not forwarded because it was determined by the Secretary to be frivolous, commercial advertising, irrelevant or similarly unsuitable is nevertheless retained in our files and made available at the request of any member of the Board to whom such communication was addressed.

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	17

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Pursuant toOur Board, at the recommendation of our Compensation Committee, sets the compensation program for non-employee directors,directors. The Compensation Committee reviews this program on an episodic basis and recommends director compensation levels based on its evaluation of competitive levels for director compensation, utilizing data drawn from our current list of peer companies and its reasoned business judgment. See “Role of Compensation Consultants and Peer Data Review” on page 31. The compensation program was last revised in 2017.

Our non-employee Board members (other than our chairman) receive the following:

Our non-executive chairmanChairman of the Board is entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $1 and does not receive any other cash fees or the initial or annual equity awards described above.

The Board has also approved a stock ownership policy for our directors. Each director is required to have ownership ofown shares our common stock (including shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and shares underlying restricted stock units) with a value equal to five times the annual cash retainer within five years of joining the Board. All of our directors except for Ms. Wienbar and Mr. Teirlinck, who waswere appointed during 2016 and 2017, respectively, have achieved these ownership targets as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

Further, our Board has adopted a policy prohibiting any director (or executive officer) from pledging as security under any obligation any shares of Colfax common stock that he or she directly or indirectly owns and controls (other than shares already pledged as of February 17, 2014), and providing that pledged shares of Colfax common stock do not count toward our stock ownership requirements.

The Board has adopted a Director Deferred Compensation Plan which permits non-employee directors to receive, at their discretion, deferred stock units, or DSUs, in lieu of their annual cash retainers and committee chairperson retainers. A director who elects to receive DSUs receives a number of units determined by dividing the cash fees earned during, and deferred for, the quarter by the closing price of our common stock on the date of the grant, which is the last trading day of the quarter. A non-employee director also may convert director restricted stock unit grants to DSUs under the plan. DSUs granted to our directors convert to shares of our common stock after termination of service from the Board, based upon a schedule elected by the director in advance. In the event that a director elects to receive DSUs, the director will receive dividend equivalent rights on such DSUs to the extent dividends are issued on our common stock. Dividend equivalents are deemed reinvested in additional DSUs (or fractions thereof) at the dividend payment date.

We also reimburse all directors for travel and other necessary business expenses incurred in the performance of their services on our Board and the committees thereof and extend coverage to them under our directors’ and officers’ indemnity insurance policies.

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	18

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation paid to our directors during 2016:2018:

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR 20162018

As of December 31, 2016,2018, the aggregate number of unvested stock awards and unexercised options outstanding held by our non-employee directors was as follows:

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	19

We are asking our stockholders to ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.2019. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of our independent auditors. Ernst & Young LLP has served as our independent auditor since their appointment in 2002. Although stockholder ratification is not required, the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP is being submitted for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice with a view towards soliciting stockholders’ opinions which the Audit Committee will take into consideration in future deliberations. If the selection is not ratified, the Audit Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to select another registered public accounting firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may select a different registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders. The Board of Directors and the Audit Committee believe that the retention of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditor is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Representatives for Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015:2017:

Audit Fees

This category of the table above includes fees for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 that were for professional services rendered (including reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses) for the integrated audits of our annual consolidated financial statements, for reviews of the financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and for statutory audits.

Audit-Related Fees

This category of the table above includes the fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” For 2017, Audit-Related Fees included the audited carve-out financial statements of our Fluid Handling business in connection with the disposition of that business in December 2017. There were no Audit-Related Fees incurred for 2018.

Tax Fees

This category of the table above includes fees billed for tax compliance, tax preparation, tax planning and other tax services. For 2016,2018, Tax Fees included approximately $476,000$910,555 for tax compliance and tax preparation and approximately $272,000$234,920 for tax planning and other tax services. For 2015,2017, Tax Fees included approximately $389,000$885,000 for tax compliance and tax preparation and approximately $463,000$270,000 for tax planning and other tax services.

All Other Fees

This category of the table above includes fees billed for products and services other than those described above under Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees and Tax Fees. For 20162018 and 2015,2017, these included fees incurred for Ernst & Young LLP’s online accounting information tool.

The Audit Committee has considered whether the services rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm with respect to the fees described above are compatible with maintaining the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence and has concluded that such services do not impair its independence.

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	20

Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee must pre-approve all auditing services, review and attest services, internal control related services and non-audit services provided to the Company by the independent registered public accounting firm and all fees payable by the Company to the independent registered public accounting firm for such services. The Audit Committee also is responsible for overseeing the audit fee negotiations associated with the retention of Ernst & Young LLP for the audit of our financial statements. The Audit Committee has adopted a pre-approval policy to promote compliance with the NYSE’s listing standards and the applicable SEC rules and regulations relating to auditor independence. In accordance with the Audit Committee charter and the pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee reviews with Ernst & Young LLP and management the plan and scope of Ernst & Young LLP’s proposed annual financial audit and quarterly reviews, including the procedures to be utilized and Ernst & Young LLP’s compensation, and pre-approves all auditing services, review and attest services, internal control related services and permitted non-audit services (including the fees and terms thereof) to be performed for us by Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more members of the Audit Committee consistent with the pre-approval policy, provided that the decisions of such Audit Committee member or members must be presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. Pre-approval of permitted non-audit services can only be approved by the full Audit Committee.

VOTE REQUIRED

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy at the votes castAnnual Meeting and entitled to vote is required to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.2019.

BOARD RECOMMENDATION

The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote“FOR”the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	21

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee consists of A. Clayton Perfall, Patrick Allender, and Thomas Gayner, and Didier Teirlinck, who are all non-management directors. The members of the Audit Committee meet the independence and financial literacy requirements of the NYSE and the additional, heightened independence criteria applicable to members of the Audit Committee under SEC and NYSE rules. In 2016,2018, the Audit Committee held nine meetings. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors, which it annually reviews. The charter, which complies with all current regulatory requirements, is available on the Company’s website atwww.colfaxcorp.comon the Investors page under the Corporate Governance tab. During 2016,2018, at each of its regularly scheduled meetings, the Audit Committee met with senior members of the Company’s finance team. Additionally, the Audit Committee has separate private sessions, during its regularly scheduled meetings, with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and head of internal audit, respectively. The Audit Committee is updated periodically on management’s process to assess the adequacy of the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting, the framework used to make the assessment, and management’s conclusions on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm, their evaluation of the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting.

The Audit Committee evaluates the performance of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm each year and determines whether to reengage the current independent registered accounting firm or consider other independent registered accounting firms. In doing so, the Audit Committee considers the quality and efficiency of the services provided by the independent registered accounting firm, the firm’s global capabilities, and the firm’s technical expertise, tenure as the Company’s independent registered accounting firm and knowledge of the Company’s global operations and businesses. In connection with the applicable audit partner rotation requirements, the Audit Committee also is involved in considering the selection of the auditors’ lead engagement partner when rotation is required. Based on this evaluation, the Audit Committee decided to engage Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019. The Audit Committee reviews with the independent registered accounting firm and management, the overall audit scope and plans, as well as the results of internal and external audit examinations and evaluations by management and the independent registered accounting firm of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting and the quality of the Company’s financial reporting. Although the Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee recommends that the Board ask stockholders, at the Company’s annual meeting, to ratify the appointment of the independent registered accounting firm (see Proposal 2 beginning on page 20).

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162018 with management and with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, including a discussion of the quality and suitability of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant accounting judgments and estimates, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. In addressing the quality of management’s accounting judgments, members of the Audit Committee are appraised of certifications prepared by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer that the unaudited quarterly and audited annual consolidated financial statements of the Company fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.

In performing all of these functions, the Audit Committee acts in an oversight capacity. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s quarterly and annual reports on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K prior to filing with the SEC. In its oversight role, the Audit Committee relies on the work and assurances of the Company’s management, which has the primary responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for preparing the financial statements, and other reports, and of the independent registered public accounting firm, who are engaged to review the quarterly consolidated financial statements of the Company, and audit and report on the annual consolidated financial statements of the Company and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of the Company’s year-end.

The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by applicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). The Audit Committee has received from the independent registered public accounting firm the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm its independence. On the basis of the reviews and discussions referenced above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162018 be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

A. Clayton Perfall, Audit Committee Chair

Patrick Allender

Thomas Gayner
Didier Teirlinck

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	22

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The following discussion and analysis of compensation arrangements of our named executive officers for 20162018 should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures set forth under the section heading “Executive Compensation.”

Executive Summary

Named Executive Officers

The following discussion provides details regarding our executive compensation program and the compensation of our named executive officers in 2016.2018. Our named executive officers (“NEOs”) for 20162018 are:

Our Compensation Philosophy and Guiding Principles

Our executive compensation approach links compensation to Company and individual performance while aligning the long-term interests of management and stockholders. We strive to create a compensation program for our associates, including our executives, that provides a compelling and engaging opportunity to attract, retain and motivate the best talent. We believe this opportunity results inthat our compensation programs motivate performance-driven leadership that is aligned to achieve our financial and strategic objectives with the intention to deliver superior long-term returns to our stockholders. Utilizing this philosophy, our executive compensation program has been designed to:

Fiscal 20162018 Pay for Performance Alignment and Compensation Overview

Fiscal 2016 consolidated results did not meet our internal targets as market conditions were more severe than expected and our total revenue declined by 8% overall. However, restructuring initiatives were significantly expanded, improving our global cost position and contributing to our achievement of the high-end of adjusted EPS expectations. Further, we applied our business management system, CBS, to improve commercial processes, endingDuring the year with two consecutive quarters of orderwe delivered strong financial performance and furthered our portfolio transformation that we believe will build sustained long-term value for our stockholders. Corporate earnings increased 33% and exceeded our expectations, supported in part by strong growth in our GasESAB business and improved operating execution in our Howden business. We acquired four complementary businesses in growing markets and in the fourth quarter announced the acquisition of DJO Global, Inc. (“DJO”), a leading global orthopedic solutions business. Following the 2017 divestiture of our Fluid Handling platform. business, the DJO acquisition continues our drive to create a higher margin and less cyclical company with increased exposure to growing markets.

We believe we are well-positioned for further operating improvements in 2017; however, we did not achieve certain company-wideachieved and exceeded our internal corporate financial and operational and financial targets for 2016, which resulted in below-target payouts forgoals, leading to an overall corporate bonusesbonus achievement under our Annual Incentive Plan. Despite not reaching internal targets, ourPlan (“AIP”) of 121% for Messrs. Trerotola, Hix, and Pryor.

ESAB drove significant growth year-over-year for the second consecutive year and improved its adjusted operating execution versus 2015 resultedprofit and working capital turns. These results were reflected in an increaseAIP achievement of 120% for Mr. Kambeyanda.

Howden made continued progress in reshaping the bonus payout percentage comparedbusiness for less cyclical, more profitable growth and furthered the shift to 2015,faster-growing industrial applications. Orders and our ESAB business largely achieved its internal targets.backlog

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	23

The key actionsincreased during the year and we achieved significant year-over-year margin improvement during the fourth quarter. End-market pressures impacted the operating environment for the full year, as reflected in an AIP achievement of our95% for Mr. Brander.

Further, the Compensation Committee and highlights of our executive compensation program in 2016 include:took the following actions with respect to long-term incentives during 2018:

Stockholder Engagement and Compensation Program Enhancements2018 Say-On-Pay Vote

InAt our 2018 Annual Meeting, approximately 98% of the stockholder votes cast on our advisory proposal to approve the compensation of our NEOs were voted in favor of our executive compensation proposal. Our Compensation Committee considered the outcome of this vote in the context of our prior and on-going engagement with stockholders and accordingly did not make any additional changes to our executive compensation policies and program elements. The Compensation Committee has determined to provide for an annual “say-on-pay” proposal and will continue to carefully evaluate the feedback received from our stockholders in connection with our 2016 Annual Meeting, some stockholders raised concerns with certain compensation actions taken during 2015 and 2016, and the voting results for our Compensation Committee members at our 2016 Annual Meeting were lower than in prior years. In response and as part of our Board and management’s continued appraisal of our compensation program, we expanded our stockholder outreach during 2016, which contributed to changes in certain aspects of our compensation program going forward. We reached out to a broad spectrum of stockholders around the time of our 2016 Annual Meeting. In addition, during the second half of 2016 we held meetings to discuss and obtain additional feedback from several unaffiliated stockholderson that collectively owned approximately 20% of our outstanding shares (which was in addition to the input we regularly receive from two of our largest stockholders, Mitchell Rales, Chairman of our Board, and BDT Capital Partners via San Orr, who serves on our Board of Directors). This outreach was conducted by our Chief Financial Officer and Head of Investor Relations. We received helpful questions and input regarding various aspects of our compensation program throughout this process. While stockholders were generally comfortable with the overall structure of our compensation program, we received comments and recommendations primarily addressing the frequency of our say-on-pay vote, the special equity awards granted to some of our executives in 2015 and 2016, and the design of our performance restricted stock units (“PRSUs”).proposal.

During the second half of 2016Our Executive Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program includes elements designed to align with Company objectives and long-term stockholder returns, including PRSU grants redesigned in 2017 with a cumulative three-year performance period for both a key operational improvement metric (for 2018, adjusted operating margin) and TSR relative to a comparable benchmark index (S&P MidCap 400 Industrials), as well as an annual say-on-pay vote for consistent stockholder feedback.

For 2018 the Compensation Committee and its independent consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co. (“FW Cook”), with support from Colfax’s Global Human Resources team, conducted a comprehensive review ofestablished the Company’s executivefollowing target compensation program in light offor our Board and Compensation Committee’s evaluation and input as well as the feedback from our stockholders. As a result of this process, the Compensation Committee affirmed our commitment to align pay with performance by approving changes to increase accountability and enhance the link between individual pay and execution of our strategy to improve operating performance.executive officers:

The refinements approved by the2018 NEO Incentive Compensation Committee and Board as a result of the continued appraisal of our compensation program and discussions with stockholders are discussed in the table below:Structure (Average)

*	This reflects performance goals under the plan for corporate-level executives; weightings and performance goals differ for business unit executives as discussed below.

Our 2018 executive compensation structure consists of three core compensation elements– base salary, an annual cash bonus, and long-term incentives. The Compensation Committee reviewed each element individually while also considering the total compensation

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	24

Further, the Compensation Committee, as a result of its consideration of the factors detailed above, approved the following compensation program structure for our executive officers applicable for the upcoming 2017 fiscal period:

Our Executive Compensation Program

Our overall executive compensation philosophy is discussed above under “Our Compensation Philosophy and Guiding Principles” on page 23.

The Compensation Committee looks at each of the three compensation elements– base salary, Annual Incentive Plan, and long-term incentives– individually while also considering the total compensation package provided to create an appropriate mix designed to attract, incentivize, and retain our executives. Each primary elementThe following table summarizes the core elements of our 2018 executive compensation program has a different purpose:program:

- 2017 Proxy Statement	25

Further, the charts below reflect that a majority of our named executive officers’ compensation is at-risk and driven by a mix of short and long-term financial and operational metrics, consistent with our pay for performance philosophy:

The framework of our executive compensation program includes the governance features and other specific elements discussed below:

What we do			What we don’t do
	Pay for performance focus – – Our AIP compensation is linked to pre-established financial and operational goals that are intended to drive performance over the yearlyannual performance plan period. Options and PRSUs are linked with longer-term performance, and our stock price, and, for PRSUs, a key operational metric and relative TSR, which we believe incentivizes long-term Company success.success and stockholder value creation.			No gross-up payments to cover excise taxes or perquisites –– We do not provide tax gross-ups to our executives in connection with severance benefits or executive perquisites other than relocation.
	Varying performance metrics under short-term and longer-term incentive plans – – In balancing compensation objectives linked to short-short-term and long-term periods of time, the Company seeks to align compensation with several performance metrics that are critical to achievement of sustained growth and stockholder value creation.			No pledging andor hedging of Company stock – – We prohibit our executives and directors from hedging Colfax stock and from entering into new pledge arrangements or derivative agreements using Colfax stock.
	Caps on Annual Incentive Plan payouts – – Executive bonus payments are capped under our AIP, as approved by our stockholders, in part to discourage excessive risk taking. The Compensation Committee is prohibited from increasing compensation payablethe results with respect to each performance metric once established, but retains the discretion to reduce or eliminate compensation under our AIP even if performance goals are attained.			No repricing or buyout of underwater stock options – – We do not permit the repricing of underwater stock options without the express approval of our stockholders.
	Double trigger provisions for change in control – – Severance payable upon a change in control is only received upon executive’s employment termination without cause or resignation for good reason within two years following the change in control. This approach is commonly referred to as “double trigger.”			No excessive change in control payments – No severance upon a change in control in excess of two times salary and target bonus.
	Clawback Policy and Insider Trading Policy – We have a comprehensive compensation clawback policy that is triggered by a material restatement of the Company’s financial statements and applies to all of our executive officers, and enforce a strict insider trading policy and blackout periods for executives and directors.			No short-term vesting – We do not award any long-term incentives with a vesting period shorter than one-year.
	Stock Ownership Policy – We have a robust stock ownership policy to further align the long-term financial interests of Company executives with those of our stockholders.			No compensation programs or policies that reward for material or excessive risk taking – – We annually review the Company’s compensation policies and practices in relation to our risk management practice and any potential risk-taking incentives. Our most recent assessment in March 20172019 concluded that the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
	Clawback Policy – We have a comprehensive compensation clawback policy that is triggered by a material restatement of the Company’s financial statements and applies to all of our executive officers.
	Stock Ownership Policy – We have a robust stock ownership policy to further align the long-term financial interests of Company executives with those of our stockholders.
	Independent Compensation Committee and Consultant – – Our Compensation Committee is comprised solely of independent directors. The Compensation Consultantcompensation consultant to the Compensation Committee during 2016,2018, FW Cook (i) is, based on the Compensation Committee’s assessment, independent and without any conflicts of interest with the Company and (ii) has never provided any services to the Company other than the compensation-related services provided to the Compensation Committee. See page 3332 for further details.			No pension plan – We do not maintain a pension plan for any senior executives, other than a frozen foreign plan that we acquired via acquisition which is limited to a small number of historical participants.

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	26
	25

Determination of Executive Compensation and Performance Criteria

Our executive compensation program is based on the philosophy and design outlined above with a focus on exceptional performance and continuous improvement from our management team. Within this framework, the Compensation Committee exercises its reasoned business judgment in making executive compensation decisions and takes into account recommendations by our chief executive officerChief Executive Officer with respect to the compensation of each executive officer, other than himself (see “CEO Recommendations” on page 33)31). Some of the factors that generally are referenced when making executive compensation decisions, none of which are assigned a particular weight, are as follows:

Further, a substantial percentage of compensation under our Annual Incentive Plan is determined solely by the achievement of annual performance criteria based on Board-approved financial and operational goals for the fiscal year. These goals are then incorporated into the metrics set for our Annual Incentive Plan and approved by the Compensation Committee, as further discussed under “Financial“Bonus Calculation - Financial and Operational Metrics”Metrics and 2018 Performance Results” on page 30.28. We believe that this link to our Board-established corporate and business goals establishesreinforces alignment and incentives for breakthrough results both at the business-unit level and Company-wide.

2016 Management Succession

During 2016 we announced the appointment of Mr. Hix as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer and Mr. Kambeyanda as Senior Vice President and ESAB’s President. In connection with the appointment of each we entered into compensation arrangements with them that resulted from an arm’s length negotiation. The Compensation Committee reviewed new-hire market analyses provided by FW Cook and also utilized competitive data drawn from the same list of peer companies previously reviewed by FW Cook and used as a general reference by the Compensation Committee for our other executive officers (see page 33 below). Informed by the strategic goals of the Company, the Compensation Committee and, for Mr. Hix, the Board and Compensation Committee determined to employ the same compensation program elements and principles used for our other executives.

The new hire compensation package for each is set forth in the tables below:

			Christopher Hix New Hire Compensation		Shyam Kambeyanda New Hire Compensation
Base Salary			$550,000		$ 470,000
Annual Incentive Plan Target (Percent of Base Salary)			80% (paid pro rata for 2016)		70% (guaranteed at full-year target for 2016 only)
Transition Bonus Amounts (Target Value)
■	RSUs		$500,000 (vest in three equal annual tranches beginning on the 2ndanniversary of grant)		$1,150,000 (vest in two equal annual tranches beginning on the 3rdanniversary of grant)
■	Cash Bonus		$100,000 (subject to repayment in the event of a separation in 1styear)		$1,300,000 (paid over a five-year period and contingent on future employment)
Long-Term Incentive Awards (Target Value)
■	Stock Options		$1,200,000 (vest in three equal annual tranches beginning on the 1stanniversary of grant)		$225,000 (vest in three equal annual tranches beginning on the 1stanniversary of grant)
■	PRSUs		$400,000 (subject to the achievement of specified performance criteria, vest in two equal tranches on the 3rdand 4thanniversaries of grant)		$450,000 (subject to the achievement of specified performance criteria, vest in two equal tranches on the 3rd and 4thanniversaries of grant)
■	RSUs		N/A		$225,000 (vest in three equal annual tranches beginning on the 2ndanniversary of grant)

In connection with his retirement, Mr. Brannan, the Company’s prior Chief Financial Officer, entered into a Part-Time Employment Agreement. Under this agreement, Mr. Brannan will continue as a part-time non-executive employee from October 1, 2016 until October 1, 2019 at an annual salary of $100,000. Mr. Brannan and the Company agreed that he was to be paid a pro rata bonus for 2016 at his target level for the period from January 1, 2016 until commencement of his part-time service on October 1, 2016. Prior to the commencement of his part-time service Mr. Brannan was paid at his previously agreed upon base salary level of $450,000, which was unchanged from its 2015 level.

- 2017 Proxy Statement	27

Back to Contents

Elements of Our 20162018 Executive Compensation Program

 

Base Salary

 

Base salaries are designed to provide compensation that is market competitive so that we can attract the best qualified individuals and retain our senior management. Base salaries are established at an executive’s hire and generally reviewed annually for potential increases. The salary levels set for our named executive officersNEOs in fiscal 2016, other than for Mr. Trerotola, who was hired in July of 2015,2018 were based on the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the relative roles and responsibilities of management and the results of their individual performance assessments, combined with perspective from the competitive compensation data prepared by FW Cook and the Compensation Committee’s reasoned business judgment. Due to our performance in 2015 and budget considerations for the 2016 fiscal year, none of our named executive officers base salaries increased from 2015 levels. Messrs. Hix and Kambeyanda’sNEO base salaries were set as part of their respective hires, as described above under “2016 Management Succession” on page 27.modestly increased in 2018 primarily reflecting our continued operational improvements and the Compensation Committee’s competitive marketplace review. A comparison of base salary levels set for 20162018 and 20152017 is set forth below:

 

Named Executive Officer	2015 Annual Base Salary	2016 Annual Base Salary	Percentage Increase		2017 Annual Base Salary				2018 Annual Base Salary				Percentage Increase
Mr. Trerotola	$ 1,000,000		0%		$	1,030,000			$	1,056,000				2.5	%
Mr. Hix	—	$ 550,000	N/A		$	560,000			$	575,000				2.7	%
Mr. Brannan	$ 450,000		0%
Mr. Pryor	$ 515,000		0%		$	530,000			$	550,000				3.8	%
Mr. Kambeyanda	—	$ 470,000	N/A		$	490,000			$	510,000				4.1	%
Ms. Puckett	$ 415,000		0%
Ms. Clark	$ 385,000		0%
Mr. Brander					£	310,000			£	320,000				3.2	%

 

Annual Incentive Plan

 

The goal of our Annual Incentive PlanAIP is to reward our executives for achievement in key areas of Company operational and financial performance.performance as well as each executive’s individual contributions to Company success. Our Annual Incentive PlanAIP provides our named executive officersNEOs the opportunity to receive an incentive payment that is expressed as a percentage of the executive’s base salary (i.e., “target bonus”). The target bonus incentivizes our named executive officers to achieve outstandingOur AIP performance in key Company performancemeasures and specific financial and operational metrics set by our Compensation Committeeare established at the beginning of each year and are derived from annual goals for Colfax’s operational and financial performance established by our Board in its strategic planning and corporate budget for Colfax’s operational and financial performance. development.

The performance metrics established by the Compensation Committee for business leaders reflect both Company-wide goals and business-specific performance targets. TheIn addition, the amount payable under the AIP can be adjusted upward or downward based on the individual performance measures andfactor, which is linked to specific, financial and operational metrics used, which are discussed below in greater detail, are set at the beginning of each year.individualized goals. Actual bonus amounts are determined following completion of the performance year and are based on performance relative to the pre-established goals.goals using the following formulas:

- 2019 Proxy Statement

26

Back to Contents

 

 

Under our Annual Incentive Plan, executives can achieve a payout percentage of their target bonus ranging from threshold of 50% to maximum of 200%, with 100% target goal achievement resulting in 100% payout of the individual’s target bonus for that performance metric. Plan:

■	executives can achieve a payout percentage of their target bonus ranging from zero for below-target performance to a threshold of 50% to a maximum of 200%, with 100% target goal achievement resulting in 100% payout of the individual’s target bonus for that performance metric, based on the extent to which objective pre-established financial and operational performance goals are achieved; and
■	the amount earned based on Company-wide and business-specific performance is subject to adjustment upward (by up to 50%, subject to a 250% payout cap) or downward to zero based on individual achievement as measured by an Individual Performance Factor (IPF).

The payout percentageIPF is based on the extent to which objective pre-established financial and operational performance goals are achieved, subject to an overall adjustment upward (by up to 50%, subject to a 250% payout cap) or downward to zero based on individual achievement as measured by an individual performance factor. The individual performance factors are linked to each executive’s specific annual objectives, which are separate from the operational performance measures under the Annual Incentive Plan but are also designed to meaningfully drive Company performance, key initiatives, and build our foundation for future growth. The formulas below demonstrate how bonus calculations under the Annual Incentive Plan are made:

 

- 2017 Proxy Statement	28

Back to Contents

Detail regarding the individual components of these formulas, including a calculation of the payout percentages and description of the individual performance factorIPF component, follows the named executive officerNEO bonus payout tables.

 

Key Executive Team Achievements

■	Delivery of earnings, revenue growth, and initiatives that reduced our income tax rate, consistent with our commitment to providing long-term stockholder returns
■	Continued increases in ESAB sales while successfully navigating raw material cost inflation
■	Howden order improvement and momentum on end-market diversification
■	Increased new product and applications development and improved vitality index for sales of these new offerings
■	Execution of restructuring actions that reduced our 2018 costs
■	Announced acquisition of DJO and strategic review of Howden business, furthering porfolio transformation, completed the initial portion of the financing for the DJO acquisition, which was achieved on attractive terms, and acquired four complementary businesses in focused growth markets
■	Sale of Circor shares from the Fluid Handling divestment, completing the monetization of this business at an attractive multiple

Bonuses Paid for 20162018 Performance

 

Bonuses were calculated using the following formula before application of the IPF as described below on page 29. The target and actual bonus award paid to each named executive officerNEO under the Annual Incentive PlanAIP for 2016, as well as the key collective achievements for the executive team,2018 are set forth below. These bonuses are also reflected in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column (or, for Mr. Kambeyanda, in the “Bonus” column) of the Summary Compensation Table below on page 37.35.

NEO		Base Salary			Target Bonus Percentage			Target Bonus					Payout Percentage			Total Annual Incentive including IPF
Mr. Trerotola		$	1,056,000		X	125%		=		$	1,320,000		X	121%			=	$	1,676,000
Mr. Hix		$	575,000		X	80%		=		$	460,000		X	121%			=	$	640,000
Mr. Pryor		$	550,000		X	80%		=		$	440,000		X	121%			=	$	532,000
Mr. Kambeyanda		$	510,000		X	75%		=		$	382,500		X	120%			=	$	460,000
Mr. Brander		£	320,000		X	75%		=		£	240,000		X	95%			=	£	273,000

 

Matthew Trerotola - 2019 Proxy Statement

27

Bonus Target	$ 1,200,000
Bonus Paid	$ 1,090,000
Shyam Kambeyanda*
Bonus Target	$ 329,000
Bonus Paid	$ 329,000

*Back to Contents

The terms of Mr. Kambeyanda’s hire provided that his 2016 AIP award was guaranteed at the minimum of his full year target award.

Lynne Puckett
Bonus Target	$ 270,000
Bonus Paid	$ 213,000
Christopher Hix	July 1ststart date
Bonus Target	$ 220,000 (pro rata)
Bonus Paid	$ 191,000 (pro rata)
Daniel Pryor
Bonus Target	$ 412,000
Bonus Paid	$ 342,000
Lynn Clark
Bonus Target	$ 250,000
Bonus Paid	$ 217,000

Key Executive Team Achievements

■	Effective execution of restructuring initiatives, contributing to our achievement of the high-end of adjusted EPS expectations and building the foundation for future earnings growth
■	Year-over-year improvement in ESAB margins
■	Acceleration of new product pipelines and renewed acquisition focus
■	Successful recruitment for and CBS immersion of new Colfax CFO and ESAB President
■	Positive ruling in asbestos litigation matter

Each of the bonuses other than Mr. Kambeyanda’s reflected above was calculated using the following formulas, with a pro rata adjustment for the portion of the year worked by Mr. Hix, before application of the individual performance factor (IPF) as described below on page 31.

NEO		Base Salary			Target Bonus Percentage			Corporate Payout Percentage			Total Annual Incentive Payout Before IPF
Matthew Trerotola		$	1,000,000		X	120%		X	79%		=          $	948,000
Christopher Hix		$	550,000		X	80%		X	79%		=          $	173,800	*
Daniel Pryor		$	515,000		X	80%		X	79%		=          $	325,480
Lynne Puckett		$	415,000		X	65%		X	79%		=          $	213,000
Lynn Clark		$	385,000		X	65%		X	79%		=          $	198,000

*	Adjusted pro-ratably for the period of his service during 2016.

Mr. Kambeyanda was paid out at full year target (100%) pursuant to the terms of his hire. ESAB’s payout percentage was 106%, which would have constituted 70% of his payout percentage for a composite 98% payout percentage before application of any individual performance factor or pro-ration. Mr. Kambeyanda will be a regular participant in the Annual Incentive Plan going forward.

Bonus Calculation – Target Bonus

 

The Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves Annual Incentive PlanAIP target bonus percentages for each executive officer in alignment with our compensation philosophy and taking into consideration the Compensation Committee’s competitive marketplace review. For 2016, the Compensation Committee approved a target bonus percentage of base salary in the following amounts:

NEO		2015 AIP Target (percent of base salary)		2016 AIP Target
Trerotola		120%		120%
Hix		N/A		80%
Pryor		75%		80%
Kambeyanda		N/A		70%
Puckett		65%		65%
Clark		65%		65%

Targets as a percentage of base salary did not change from prior year targets except for Mr. Pryor,Trerotola, whose AIP target increased from 120% to 125% to better align with the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the competitive market for executives with similar roles and experience levels.market.

 

- 2017 Proxy Statement	29

Back to Contents

Bonus Calculation – Financial and Operational Metrics and 20162018 Performance Results

 

For corporate executives, financial targets based on net sales (as adjusted), operating profit (as adjusted), working capital turns (as adjusted), and adjusted EPS constituted the performance measures under our Annual Incentive PlanAIP before the individual performance factorIPF was applied (as discussed further below on page 31)29). The Annual Incentive Plan is formulaic in nature and neither the Board, the Compensation Committee nor any executive is able to exercise any upward discretion with respect to the payout levels of each performance metric once established by the Compensation Committee. The financial and operational performance measures and corresponding weightings of these metrics for 2016 were as follows:

Measure		Weight
Net sales (as adjusted)(1)		25%
Operating Profit (as adjusted)(2)		40%
Working Capital Turns (as adjusted)(3)		20%
Adjusted EPS(4)		15%

(1)	Net sales is adjusted to exclude 2016 acquisitions, except as noted below.
(2)	Operating Profit is adjusted to remove the impact of 2016 acquisitions (except as noted below), restructuring costs, asset impairment, goodwill impairment, legacy legal and asbestos trend/coverage percentage adjustments, costs related to acquisitions in excess of budgeted amounts, and the impact of foreign currency exchange gains or losses arising from the initial recognition of a highly inflationary currency.
(3)	Working capital turns is adjusted to exclude 2016 acquisitions (except as noted below).
(4)	Adjusted EPS is defined as net income adjusted for the after-tax impact of discontinued operations, the cumulative effect of accounting changes, restructuring costs, asset impairment, goodwill impairment, legacy legal and asbestos trend/coverage percentage adjustments, costs related to acquisitions in excess of budgeted amounts, and as further adjusted for the impact of foreign currency exchange gains or losses arising from the initial recognition of a highly inflationary currency and early extinguishment of debt costs.

The Compensation Committee selected these weightings when it established the goals for the year based on the results of our Board’s strategic planning process and corporate budget. For all named executive officers,NEOs, the “target goals” (the level of performance necessary to achieve the target bonus payout) were pre-established by the Compensation Committee based upon Board-approved operational and financial goals for 20162018 that represented a significant level of improvement over 2017 results, after taking into account the disposition of our fluid handling business, and were set at levels that would represent significant progress in each category toward the achievement of the Company’s long-term growth objectives and align with the Board-approved corporate budget. Under

For Messrs. Kambeyanda and Brander, corporate measures constituted 30% of the criteriapotential payout factor with their business unit goals consisting of 70% of the total target, which is intended to drive accountability for business operational results. The Compensation Committee selected these weightings when it established the goals for the year based on the results of our Board’s strategic planning process and corporate budget. Prior to application of the IPF, the AIP is formulaic in nature and neither the Board, the Compensation Committee nor any executive is able to exercise any upward discretion with respect to the payout levels for each performance metric once established by the Compensation Committee, target goalsCommittee. The financial and operational performance measures and corresponding weightings of these metrics for business and corporate metrics2018 were adjusted to (1) account for the effect of unbudgeted currency exchange rate fluctuations on the translated financial results of businesses with operating currencies other than the U.S. dollar, and, (2) account for the inclusion in our financial results of 2016 acquisitions, but only to (i) conform with internal budgeting at the time of such adjustment and (ii) increase the financial targets required to be obtained for net sales, adjusted operating profit, or adjusted EPS goals. Adjustments are intended to measure performance based on core operational results without the impact of infrequent or unusual items, and did not lower target goals.as follows:

Measure		Corporate		ESAB		Howden
Net sales (as adjusted)(1); Orders for Howden		25%		30%		30%
Operating Profit (as adjusted)(2)		40%		50%		50%
Working Capital Turns (as adjusted)(3)		20%		20%		20%
Adjusted EPS(4)		15%		N/A		N/A

(1)	Net sales measured by U.S. GAAP sales excluding any sales from unbudgeted 2018 acquisitions, compared to 2018 budgeted sales at actual FX rates.
(2)	Adjusted operating profit measured by U.S. GAAP operating income excluding operating income from unbudgeted 2018 acquisitions and adjusting forrestructuring, non-cash asset impairments including goodwill and intangibles, transaction costs for acquisitions in excess of budget, FX gains or losses arisingfrom the initial recognition of a highly inflationary currency, financial asset impacts (due to unusual economic circumstances or devaluation by a governingbody), early extinguishment of debt costs, the cumulative effect of accounting changes, or other unplanned or nonrecurring items that the CompensationCommittee considers unusual and not representative of the underlying economic performance of the Company.
(3)	Working capital turns measured by the weighted average of the quarterly turns for the fiscal year, computed by dividing annualized quarterly sales by the average endingworking capital for each quarter. Working capital is defined as the sum of accounts receivable, other receivables, promissory notes, inventory, accounts payable, andnonrecurring items that the Compensation Committee considers unusual and not representative of the underlying economic performance of the Company.
(4)	Adjusted EPS is defined as net income adjusted for the after-tax impact of discontinued operations, the cumulative effect of accounting changes, restructuringcosts, non-cash asset impairments including goodwill and intangibles, costs related to acquisitions in excess of budgeted amounts, financial asset impacts (due tounusual economic circumstances or devaluation by a governing body), as further adjusted for the impact of foreign currency exchange gains or losses arising fromthe initial recognition of a highly inflationary currency, early extinguishment of debt costs, or other unplanned or nonrecurring items that the Compensation Committeeconsiders unusual and not representative of the underlying economic performance of the Company, dividied by the weighted average of diluted shares outstanding.

 

Payouts under our Annual Incentive PlanAIP are calculated using the following scale, before application of the IPF (which impact is capped at aby the 250% maximum payout):

 

2018 Annual Incentive Plan Payout to Performance

 

The 2016 corporate performance goals and achievement for each are set forth below. As shown in the table, the weighted average performance result for these corporate metrics was 79 percent

Metric Performance % of plan compared to 52 percent of plan for 2015.

 

*	Working capital turns (WCT) threshold and maximum set within bounds based on management assessment of WCT performance expectations.

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	30
	28

Back to Contents

Measure (weighting)		Target Goal				Threshold Goal				Threshold Payment				Maximum Goal				Maximum Payment				Actual Result				Payout Percentage				Net Payout Percentage based on weighting
Net sales (as adjusted) (25%)		$	3.727 billion			$	3.354 billion				50%			$	4.099 billion				200%			$	3.647 billion				89%				22%
Operating Profit (as adjusted) (40%)		$	358 million			$	286 million				50%			$	429 million				200%			$	326 million				78%				31%
Working Capital Turns (as adjusted) (20%)			5.8				5.1				50%				6.5				200%				5.1				50%				10%
Adjusted EPS (15%)		$	1.57/share			$	1.26/share				50%			$	1.88/share				200%			$	1.58/share				103%				16%
Weighted aggregate for all corporate metrics in 2016																															79%
Weighted aggregate for all corporate metrics in 2015																															52%

The 2018 corporate performance goals and achievement for each are set forth below. These goals took into account the impact of the fluid handing business disposition in late 2017, which business performance and contributions were included in the goals set and measurement of achievement for 2017. Accordingly, 2018 goals were below levels set for 2017 other than for adjusted earnings per share given the timing during our platform transformation. As shown in the table, the weighted average performance result for 2018 corporate metrics was 121% of plan, compared to 83% of plan for 2017 and 79% of plan for 2016.

Measure (weighting)		Target Goal				Threshold Goal				Threshold Payment		Maximum Goal				Maximum Payment		Actual Result				Payout Percentage		Net Payout Percentage based on weighting
Net sales (as adjusted) (25%)		$	3.491 billion			$	3.143 billion			50%		$	3.840 billion			200%		$	3.579 billion			25%		31%
Operating Profit (as adjusted) (40%)		$	333 million			$	267 million			50%		$	400 million			200%		$	321 million			40%		36%
Working Capital Turns (as adjusted) (20%)			4.4				4.2			50%			4.6			200%			4.5			20%		30%
Adjusted EPS (15%)		$	2.07/share			$	1.66/share			50%		$	2.49/share			200%		$	2.31/share			15%		24%
Weighted aggregate for all corporate metrics in 2018																								121%

The table below summarizes the 2018 achievement of business goals for Messrs. Kambeyanda and Brander, which aggregated with the corporate goal results as shown above determine their AIP financial and operational performance factor:

Measure		ESAB*		Howden*
Sales (as adjusted); Orders for Howden (30%)		148%		93%
Operating Profit (as adjusted) (50%)		97%		89%
Working Capital Turns (as adjusted) (20%)		160%		55%
Business Achievement		120%		83%

*	The respective business unit metrics constituted 70% of each executive’s potential AIP performance payout, in aggregate, and the corporate metrics constituted 30% of the potential payout.

We do not disclose the specific target goals or achievement applicable to our business segments as they are highly confidential to our businesses. We believe that disclosure of this information would be competitively harmful to us, as it would provide our competitors with strategic information specific to certain businesses, thus providing our competitors insight into our plans and projections for such businesses. As evidenced by our performance this year, these target levels are designed to be difficult to accomplish and are not certain to be met.

 

Bonus Calculation– Individual Performance Factor

 

In addition to the target bonus percentages and financial and operational metrics discussed above, the third and final factor under our Annual Incentive PlanAIP is the individual performance factor.Individual Performance Factor (IPF). This is a multiplier that ranges from 0 to 1.5 (subject to an overall payout cap of 250% of the target bonus) based on individual performance, embodiment of our Company’s core values, and achievement of key performance indicators (KPIs) set in advance for each executive by our Chief Executive Officer,CEO, or, for our Chief Executive Officer,CEO, by the Board. The individual performance factor and KPIs set thereunder are included as part of the Annual Incentive PlanAIP so that non-financial Company objectives over which the executive has primary control are factored in as a reasonable part of the individual’s total annual bonus for the year. The individual performance factors for each executive were determined after evaluating each named executive officer’sNEO’s performance, including the collective achievements detailed on page 2927 above. For Annual Incentive PlanAIP payouts, bonus allocations were formulated based on Board-approved budgets, with a 1.0x average payout target for participants in the Annual Incentive PlanAIP and deviations from that average permitted if supported by performance or based on external circumstances outside of management’s control. For 2018, IPFs for our NEOs ranged from 1.0 to 1.2.

 

Long-Term Incentives

 

The goal of our long-term incentive plan is to align the rewardscompensation of executives with the interests of stockholders by encouraging sustained long-term improvement in operational and financial performance and long-term increase in stockholder value. Long-term incentives also serve as retention instruments and provide equity-building opportunities for executives. In recent years, we have granted stock options and PRSUs as our mainprimary forms of equity awards, with service-based RSUs being granted primarilyprincipally as recruitment or promotionalpromotion awards at the time of hire or promotion. Vesting of PRSUs has been tied to both achieving a specified increase in cumulative adjusted earnings per share for any four consecutive quarters within a ten- to twelve-quarter period and satisfying a specified service period.

As discussed above under “Stockholder Engagement and Compensation Program Enhancements,” following feedback from our stockholders and a review of market practices, the Compensation Committee determined that,granted in 2017 vesting of PRSUs will be conditioned uponand 2018 are subject to achieving a key operational improvement metric (adjusted operating margin) over a three-year period and an investor return benchmark (relative TSR vs. the S&P MidCap 400 Industrials Index), also measured over a three-year period. We also received stockholder feedback on special equity awards that were granted in 2015 to certain of our executive officers and in January 2016 to our CEO, as discussed below. These special equity awards were a non-standard compensation element designed to address the confluence of a rapidly changing economic landscape facing our businesses and the need to attract and retain certain key executives. Although these awards have worked as designed to incentivize and retain key executives, no such special equity awards have been made following the January 2016 grant to Mr. Trerotola, and we do not anticipate the use of special or multi-year awards outside of new hire packages for our executive officers going forward.

Outstanding Equity Awards

NoneOnce vested, at least 50% of the outstandingshares delivered pursuant to the PRSUs (net of shares withheld or sold for taxes) must be held by the named executive officers were earned in 2016. Further, all stock options granted to our named executive officers over the past four years had exercise prices higher than our closing stock price on December 31, 2016, other than awards made since November 2015.

2016 CEO Grant

As discussed in our 2016 proxy statement, Mr. Trerotola was awarded a special equity grant in January 2016, in light of the unanticipated and significantly more challenging operating conditions encountered between when we recruited Mr. Trerotola to join the Company as President and Chief Executive Officer in July 2015 and the date of the award, as well as his response of quickly accelerating Company-wide restructuring efforts. The Compensation Committee considered a number of factors at the time of the grant, including deterioration in our end-markets in the latter half of 2015 and economic variables impacting operations since his hire, as well as his significant accomplishments to that point in establishing the Company’s 2016 restructuring plans, which the Board viewed as key to achieving operational and profit targets in the coming fiscal periods. The Compensation Committee received input from FW Cook regarding the potential design of a one-time award to address these factors. In view of Mr. Trerotola’sfor an additional one-year period.

 

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	31
	29

Back to Contents

importance to the Company’s strategic initiatives going forward, the Compensation Committee determined that the stock options and2018 Performance Vesting of Outstanding PRSUs

The performance metrics for PRSUs granted upon his hire in July 2015, November 2015 and in 2016, as adjusted to reflect the divestiture of the Colfax Fluid Handling business, were no longer operating with their designed motivationalcertified as achieved during 2018 and retentive intent,vest in installments based on continued service in 2018, 2019, and approved a grant to him with an aggregate grant date fair value of $9,000,000, consisting of two-thirds stock options and one-third PRSUs. The PRSUs will be earned if the Company achieves $1.76 in cumulative adjusted earnings per share for any four consecutive quarters beginning with the first fiscal quarter of 2016 and ending with the fourth fiscal quarter of 2018, representing at least a 10% increase over 2015 adjusted earnings per share.2020. These awards do not begingranted in July 2015 and November 2015 began to vest until three years from the grant datein 2018, as reflected in “Options Exercised and subject to Mr. Trerotola’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date, the awards, if earned, will vest in three equal annual installments beginning on January 4, 2019. The stock options expire seven years from the grant date.

Other 2016 Executive Equity Awards

Messrs. Hix and Kambeyanda received equity awards in connection with their hiring as described above under “2016 Management Succession”Stock Vested” table below on page 27. Mr. Pryor did not receive a 2016 annual equity grant in light of equity awarded to him during 2015. Mr. Brannan received a cash award of $75,000 in lieu of a long-term incentive grant for 2016.41.

 

Annual Grants under Omnibus Incentive Plan

 

On February 19, 2016,March 8, 2018, the Compensation Committee granted stock options and PRSUs under the 20082016 Omnibus Incentive Plan as amended with a target aggregate value as set forth in the table below:below. Mr. Trerotola did not receive annual equity grants in 2018 due to his new hire grant in 2015 and his special equity grant that was made in January 2016. Each NEO except for Mr. Brander received 50% of the annual award in the form of PRSUs and 50% of the annual award in the form of stock options. As discussed further above on page 24, Mr. Pryor’s grant reflected a one-time promotional increase due to his increased responsibilities in the areas of IT and cybersecurity and the Compensation Committee’s review of relevant market data for his expanded role. Mr. Brander’s award included stock options with a target grant date value of approximately $350,000, PRSUs with a target grant date value of approximately $350,000 consistent with the PRSU award terms for those made to our other NEOs, and RSUs with a target grant date value of approximately $300,000 that vest one year following the grant date. These RSUs were granted in contemplation of a strategic review for the Air & Gas Handling Business, which led in part to the process for exploration of the potential sale of Howden announced in connection with the DJO acquisition.

 

Annual Grant Recipient		Total Aggregate Value of Grant ($)
Ms. PuckettMr. Trerotola		800,000–
Ms. ClarkMr. Hix		700,0002,000,000
Mr. Pryor		3,750,000
Mr. Kambeyanda		1,200,000
Mr. Brander		1,000,000

 

Each received 50% of her awardStock options vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the form of stock options and 50%first anniversary of the award ingrant date and PRSUs cliff vest at the formend of PRSUs in accordance with the formula approved by our Compensation Committee. Any shares underlying PRSU awards that are earned upon conclusionthree-year measurement period to the extent of achievement of the performance period will vest in two equal installmentsmetrics based on the third and fourth anniversaries offollowing payout scale, with each factor weighted 50% in determining the grant date. The PRSUs granted in February 2016 will be earned, if at all, if the Company’s cumulative adjusted earnings per share results for any four consecutive fiscal quarters beginning in 2016 and ending in 2018 equals or exceeds $1.76. Messrs. Hix and Kambeyanda’s awards included the same performance criteria, with the performance period beginning in their first full quarter of employment in 2016 and extending for three years.award payout:

		3 Year TSR Percentile Rank*		Adjusted Operating Margin*		Resulting Shares Earned (% of target)
Below Threshold		<30th		<11.5%		0%
Threshold		30th		11.5%		50%
Target		55th		12%		100%
Maximum		80th		12.5%		200%

*	Linear interpolation between achievement points

 

Additional Compensation Information

 

Other Elements of Compensation–Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation and Perquisites

 

The Company does not maintain aan active pension plan and instead makes matching contributions to a tax-qualified 401(k) plan and the Colfax Corporation Excess Benefit Plan and, beginning during 2016, to our Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. We established the Excess Benefit Plan and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans,Plan, which provideprovides participants the opportunity to defer a percentage of their compensation without regard to the compensation limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code under our 401(k) plan, to allow our senior-level executives to contribute toward retirement on a tax-effective basis in a manner that is consistent with other Colfax employees who are not limited by the Internal Revenue Code limits. For additional details concerning the Excess Benefit Plan and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, please see the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table and the accompanying narrative disclosure. With respect to Mr. Brander, who is based in the U.K., as discussed below in the footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table, Howden makes contributions to the Howden Retirement Plan, a defined contribution plan, on his behalf. In addition, as discussed following the Pension Benefits table below, Mr. Brander maintains a balance in the Howden Group Retention Plan, a frozen defined benefit pension plan. Mr. Brander’s benefits under the Howden Group Retention Plan do not grow with any additional earnings or service.

 

Aside from the benefits provided to Mr. Trerotola at the time of his hire, which include (i) an automobile allowance of $20,000 per year and (ii) personal use of a private aircraft chartered by the Company and/or personal financial planning services (or any combination thereof) in an aggregate amount not to exceed $100,000 in compensation income (i.e., imputed income under tax rules) in any calendar year, we provide minimal perquisites to our executives including up to $10,000 in financial and tax planning services for senior executives, business-related items such as relocation assistance, which may be grossed-up consistent with competitive market recruitment practices, and benefits provided in non-U.S. locations in accordance with local practice.

 

- 2019 Proxy Statement

30

Back to Contents

Employment & Service Agreements

 

Messrs. Trerotola Pryor, and Ms. PuckettPryor are party to the same form of employment agreement. These agreements provide for a two-year initial term, or in the case of Mr. Trerotola’s CEO Employment Agreement, a three-year initial term, with automatic one-year term extensions thereafter, unless our Board or the executive provides written notice in advance to terminate the automatic extension provision. Each executive’s base salary may not be reduced below the amount previously in effect without the written agreement of the executive. In addition, as set forth in their current employment agreements, each of Messrs. Trerotola and Pryor and Ms. Puckett are entitled to participate in our Annual Incentive Plan with a target bonus amount no less than 120%, and 50%, and 50% respectively, of his or her base salary then in effect. The employment agreements with our executive officers provide severance benefits as well asand provide change in control benefits which are provided only if a termination for “good reason” or other than for “cause” occurs within two years following the change in control.control (i.e., “double trigger” provisions”).

 

Mr. Hix’s letter agreement entered into upon his hire provides for severance and change in control benefits primarily commensurate with those provided in our employment agreements. Mr. BrannanKambeyanda is party to a part-time employmentletter agreement described under “2016 Management Succession” on page 27. Mr. Kambeyanda and Ms. Clark have not entered into employment agreements with the Company that specifies his starting annual salary and area target bonus of at least 70% under the AIP. This agreement also provides for a transition bonus made in connection with his hire that is to be paid in installments over his first five years of employment (with $330,000 payable in 2017, and $130,000 payable in each of 2018, 2019 and 2020). This letter agreement also provides that Mr. Kambeyanda is subject to our Executive Officer Severance Plan. No changeMr. Brander is party to a service agreement with Howden Group Ltd., which he entered into prior to our acquisition of the Howden business in control benefits are provided thereunder.2012.

 

- 2017 Proxy Statement	32

Back to Contents

Additional details regarding the material terms of these employment agreements and Mr. Hix’s letter agreement are summarized under ” Employment Agreements”“Employment Agreements and Executive Officer Severance Plan” on page 3240 and “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 4342 and a summary of the materials terms and eligibility requirements for the Executive Officer Severance Plan is provided under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control”.

 

Stock Ownership Policy and Stock Holding Requirements

 

Our stock ownership policy further aligns the long-term financial interests of Company executives with those of our stockholders while also serving as a risk mitigation tool. Beginning January 1, 2017, eachEach executive at a vice president level or higher must retain at least one-half of vested equity awards, less shares withheld or sold for tax withholding obligations, until they havethe executive has accumulated shares of our common stock or other qualifying forms of equity having the value described below. The ownership value thresholds are as follows:

 

Leadership Position		Value of Shares
President and CEO		6x base salary
EVP/SVP		3x base salary
VP		1x base salary

 

Further, beginning in 2017, in complement to the stock ownership policy all executives must hold at least 50% of any vested PRSUs (net of taxes) for a minimum of one year following vesting and delivery. All of the Company’s named executive officersNEOs except for Mr. Brander have achieved these ownership targets as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

 

CEO Recommendations

 

During 20162018 Mr. Trerotola provided recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to the compensation levels for our executive officers, other than for himself. These recommendations were based on his assessment of the executive officer’s relative experience, overall performance, and impact on the achievement of our financial and operational goals and strategic objectives, combined with perspective from the competitive review data. While the Compensation Committee took these recommendations under advisement, it independently evaluated the pay recommendations for each executive officer and made all final compensation decisions in accordance with its responsibilities as set forth in the Compensation Committee Charter.

 

Role of Compensation Consultants and Peer Data Review

 

Our Compensation Committee also obtains perspective from competitive data reviewed by FW Cook, the independent advisor to the Compensation Committee on matters of executive compensation. In July 2013, theThe Compensation Committee considered aannually reviews the list of peer companies previously recommended by FW Cook, as updated to align withremove companies for acquisitions (Joy Global Inc. was removed from the prior list following its sale in 2017), to reflect the peers used by financial analysts and governance advisors covering Colfax and to reflectrepresent our growth trajectory, revenue, market capitalization and overall scope and nature of operations, which list continued to be used as a reference point by the Compensation Committee during 2016, with the exception of Dresser Rand, which was removed from the group following its acquisition in 2015. Ouroperations. The peer group isreferenced in early 2018 was as follows:

 

Colfax Peer Group
Ametek Inc.		Illinois Tool Works Inc.		Snap-on Incorporated
Crane Co.		Joy GlobalKennametal Inc.		SPX Corporation
Dover Corporation		KennametalLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.		The Timken Company
Eaton Corporation plc		Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.Pentair plc		Valmont Industries, Inc.
Flowserve Corporation		Pentair plcRockwell Automation, Inc.		Xylem Inc.
IDEX Corporation		Rockwell Automation,Roper Technologies, Inc.		Roper Technologies, Inc.

In September 2018, the Compensation Committee removed Illinois Tool Works, Inc. and Eaton Corporation plc from the peer group for reference on executive pay decisions going forward.

 

While competitive review data drawn from this group is not used to “benchmark” the amount of compensation paid to the named executive officersNEOs (or to our executives in general), the information was utilized by the Compensation Committee as one of many reference points to assist in its compensation decisions.

 

- 2019 Proxy Statement

31

Back to Contents

Independence of Compensation Consultant

 

At a meeting in March 2017,2019, the Compensation Committee considered the independence of FW Cook in light of the SEC rules regarding conflicts of interest involving compensation consultants and NYSE listing standards regarding compensation consultant independence. The Compensation Committee requested and received a letter from FW Cook addressing conflicts of interest and independence, including specific factors enumerated in both relevant SEC rules and NYSE listing standards. The Compensation Committee discussed and considered these factors, and other factors it deemed relevant, and concluded that FW Cook is independent and that its work during 20162018 did not raise any conflict of interest.

 

- 2017 Proxy Statement	33

Back to Contents

Compensation Program and Risk

 

As part of our continued appraisal of our compensation program, management, with oversight from the Compensation Committee, annually reviews our compensation policies and practices and the design of our overall compensation program in relation to our risk management practices and any potential risk-taking incentives. This assessment includes a review of the primary elements of our compensation program in light of potential risks:

 

Compensation Program Risk Considerations

Pay Mix	■	Compensation program includes an appropriate mix of short and long-term incentives, which mitigates the risk of undue focus on short-term targets while rewarding performance in areas that are key to our long-term success.
	■	Base salaries are set at competitive levels to promote stability and provide a component of compensation that is not at risk.
Performance Metrics and Goals	■	Distinct performance metrics are used in both our short-term (AIP) and long-term incentive plans. Adjusted EPS is no longer a component of our long-term incentive plans beginning in 2017, eliminating redundancy in objectives.
	■	Our Annual Incentive Plan is designed with a payout scale (including a maximum cap) that supports our pay for performance philosophy, as set forth on page 28 above.23.
Long-Term Incentives	■	The equity grant portion of our compensation program, combined with our stock ownership guidelines and stock holding requirements, is designed to align the long-term interests of our executives with those of our stockholders.

 

We have controls and other policies in place that serve to limit excessive risk-taking behavior within our compensation program, including but not limited to the following:

 

Compensation Risk Mitigation Components

Compliance Risk Mitigation	■	Oversight of our compensation process and procedures by the Compensation Committee, each member of which has been determined by the Board to be independent under applicable SEC rules and NYSE listing standards;
	■	Internal controls over our financial reporting, which are maintained by management and reviewed as a part of our internal audit process and further reviewed and tested by our external auditors, as overseen by the Audit Committee; and
	■	Audit Committee oversight and review of financial results and non-GAAP metrics used in certain components of our annual incentive planAIP and long-term incentives.
Personnel Risk Mitigation	■	Implementation of and training on Company-wide standards of conduct, as described on page 15 under “Standards of Conduct”.
Risk Mitigation Policies	■	Provisions in the Company’s insider trading policy prohibiting hedging transactions that would allow the holder to limit or eliminate the risk of a decrease in the value of the Company’s securities;
	■	A policy prohibiting pledging of Company shares after February 17, 2014; and
	■	A clawback policy applicable to all executive officers.

 

The Compensation Committee reviewed with management the results of its assessment at a meeting in March 2017.2019. Based on this review, the Compensation Committee concluded that the risks arising from Company compensation policies and practices for our employees are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

Hedging Ban

 

Any director, officer or employee of the Company is prohibited from engaging in short sales, transactions in derivative securities (including put and call options), or other forms of hedging and monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars, equity swaps, exchange funds and forward sale contracts, that allow the holder to limit or eliminate the risk of a decrease in the value of the Company’s securities.

 

Pledging Policy

 

Our Board has adopted a policy that prohibits any director or executive officer from pledging as security under any obligation any shares of Colfax common stock that he or she directly or indirectly owns and controls (other than shares already pledged as of February 17, 2014). Any shares of Colfax common stock that were pledged prior to February 17, 2014 do not count toward our stock ownership requirements.

 

- 2019 Proxy Statement

32

Back to Contents

Clawback Policy

 

The Compensation Committee has adopted a clawback policy applicable to our executive officers. Under the policy, in the event the Company is required to restate its financial results due to material non-compliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws as generally applied, the Board will review all bonus payments made, including all bonus payments under our Annual Incentive Plan, and all performance-based equity compensation that was earned or vested on the basis of having met or exceeded financial results during the three years prior to the date that the Company determines such restatement is required.

 

If the Board determines that such payments or the amount of awards earned/vested would have been lower had they been determined or calculated based on such restated results, the Board will, to the extent permitted by governing law, seek to recoup for the benefit of the Company the value of such excess payments made to and/or

- 2017 Proxy Statement	34

Back to Contents

equity awards earned by executive officers. The Board maintains discretion, to the extent permitted under applicable law, not to seek such recoupments if the Board determines, in the exercise of its fiduciary duties, that under the specific circumstances it would not be appropriate to seek to recover such amounts. The Company may effect such recoupment by requiring executive officers to pay such amount(s) to the Company, by set-off, by reducing future compensation, or by such other means or combination of means as the Board determines to be appropriate.

 

Equity Grant Practice

 

The Compensation Committee has the authority to grant equity awards. The Company does not time the grant of equity awards around material, non-public information. Grant dates are determined either as of the date of Compensation Committee approval or on the date of a specific event, such as the date of hire or promotion, for certain executive officers. The target grant value is translated into a number of shares underlying each grant using a valuation formula that, for RSUs, and PRSUs, incorporates a 15-day average closing price preceding the grant date, of Compensation Committee approval, to avoid the potential volatility impact of using a single-day closing price.price, whereas PRSUs use the grant date accounting value as determined through Monte Carlo modeling. Grants of equity awards (other than to newly-appointed directors or newly-hired or promoted associates) are expected to be made annually by the Compensation Committee during “open-window” periods, which are the periods when officers and directors are not expressly prohibited from trading in shares of our common stock by our applicable policies. Equity awards to newly-appointed directors, and to newly-hired or promoted associates, are expected to be made during an “open–window” period whenever possible, and, for newly-hired or promoted associates, are reviewed and approved at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Compensation Committee and made effective as of that date or as of the first date during the next “open-window” period.

 

The Compensation Committee has authorized the delegation of authority to our Chief Executive OfficerCEO for grants of equity awards to associates that are non-executive officers. The aggregate grant value of such equity awards may not exceed one-third of the total grant value of equity awards made during the fiscal year period, are subject to further restrictions on individual size, and are made pursuant to the terms of award agreement forms previously approved by the Board or the Compensation Committee. The effective grant date of these awards is the first day of the month following such review and approval by the CEO (and following the start date for any newly hired associates) or at a regularly scheduled Compensation Committee following such approval, subject to the “open-window” restrictions noted above. The Compensation Committee receives a report of any grants made pursuant to this delegated authority at each regularly scheduled meeting.

 

Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans by Executive Officers

 

Certain of our executive officers have adopted written stock trading plans in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act and our own Policy on Insider Trading and Compliance. A Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plan is a written document that pre-establishes the amount (or ratio), prices, and dates (or range of possible dates) of future purchase or sales of our common stock. These plans are entered into during an open window period under our Policy on Insider Trading and Compliance. To date, certain named executive officersNEOs have entered into such plans (i) to sell the percentage of vested shares necessary to satisfy applicable tax withholding obligations upon the vesting and delivery of performance-based restricted stock units,PRSUs, or (ii) to exercise options that are approaching the end of their term.

Most Recent Say-On-Pay Vote (2014)

At our 2014 Annual Meeting, approximately 99% of the stockholder votes cast on our advisory proposal to approve the compensation of our named executive officers were voted in favor of our executive compensation proposal. Our Compensation Committee did not set or change our executive compensation policies as a result of 2014’s advisory vote results. As discussed above under “Stockholder Engagement and Compensation Program Enhancements,” our Compensation Committee has implemented a number of enhancements to our executive compensation program based on our engagement with our stockholders over the past year.

 

Effect of Accounting and Tax Treatment on Compensation Decisions

 

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a $1 million limit on the amount of compensation that we may deduct in any one year with respect to any “covered employees”. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, the exemption from Section 162(m)’s deduction limit that formerly existed for certain “covered employees,” unless“performance-based” compensation was repealed (except for certain specificgrandfathered compensation arrangements that were in effect as of November 2, 2017 and detailed criteria are satisfied. Performance-basednot materially modified after such date). Accordingly, we expect that compensation as definedawarded to our named executive officers in 2018 and subsequent years will not be deductible to the Internal Revenue Code, is fully deductible ifextent that it arises from awards and arrangements entered into or modified after November 2, 2017 and results in compensation above the programs are approved by stockholders and meet other requirements. Following stockholder approval at our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the material terms for payment of performance-based compensationthreshold established under our 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and at our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the material terms for payment of performance-based compensation under our 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, subsequent grants of stock options and performance-based equity awards were designed in a manner intended to qualify as performance-based for purposes of satisfying the conditions of Section 162(m). Also, bonuses awarded pursuant to our Annual Incentive Plan were also designed in a manner intended to qualify as “performance-based” for the purposes of Section 162(m). However, we seek to maintain flexibility in compensating our executives, and, as a result, the Board has not adopted a policy requiring that all compensation be deductible. Our Compensation Committee assesses the impact of Section 162(m) on our compensation practices and determines what further action, if any, is appropriate, and may administer these plans (and any successor plans) in a manner that does not satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) in order to achieve a result that the Compensation Committee determines to be appropriate. In addition,Furthermore, the rules and regulations promulgated under Section 162(m) are complicated and subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect, and a number of requirements must be met in order for particular awards to qualify for tax-deduction.change. As such, there can be no assurance that any arrangements entered into or awarded prior to November 2, 2017 or any compensation awarded or paid in prior years will be fully tax deductible. Notwithstanding repeal of the exemption for “performance-based” compensation, the Compensation Committee intends to operate our executive compensation program in a manner that they believe best aligns compensation with performance and long-term shareholder value.

 

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	35
	33

Back to Contents

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

 

The Compensation Committee participated in the preparation of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, reviewing successive drafts and discussing the drafts with management. Based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s 20172019 Proxy Statement and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 20162018 by reference to the Proxy Statement.

 

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

 

Rhonda Jordan, Compensation Committee Chair

Rajiv Vinnakota

Sharon Wienbar

 

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	36
	34

Back to Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)(1)	Stock Awards ($)(2)	Option Awards ($)(3)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(4)	All Other Compensation ($)(5)	Total ($)
Matthew L. Trerotola	2016	1,000,000	1,000,000	3,056,644	5,461,335	1,090,000	334,937	11,942,916
President and Chief Executive	2015	426,923	1,000,000	8,250,021	6,479,358	766,000	642,383	17,564,685
Officer
Christopher M. Hix	2016	266,539	100,000	861,394	1,200,004	191,000	101,990	2,720,927
Senior Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
C. Scott Brannan	2016	369,231	328,125	—	—	—	55,102	752,458
Former Senior Vice President,	2015	450,000	150,000	—	—	234,000	53,369	887,369
Finance and Chief Financial Officer	2014	408,786	—	—	340,823	286,000	42,097	1,077,706
Daniel A. Pryor	2016	515,000	—	—	—	342,000	45,360	902,360
Executive Vice President, Strategy	2015	509,231	—	2,573,029	2,642,135	241,000	48,554	6,013,949
and Business Development	2014	486,537	—	—	—	300,000	50,312	836,849
Shyam Kambeyanda	2016	304,596	589,000	1,594,944	225,000	—	71,585	2,785,125
Senior Vice President, Colfax and
ESAB President
A. Lynne Puckett	2016	415,000	—	438,496	400,003	213,000	35,460	1,501,959
Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary
Lynn H. Clark	2016	385,000	—	383,681	349,998	217,000	32,460	1,368,139
Senior Vice President, Global
Head of Human Resources

Name and Principal Position		Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)(1)		Stock Awards ($)(2)		Option Awards ($)(3)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(4)		Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(5)		All Other Compen- sation($)(6)		Total ($)
Matthew Trerotola		2018		1,049,000		–		–		–		1,676,000		–		422,927		3,147,927
President and Chief Executive Officer		2017		1,021,932		1,000,000		–		–		881,000		–		374,184		3,277,107
		2016		1,000,000		1,000,000		3,056,644		5,461,355		1,090,000		–		334,937		11,942,916
Christopher Hix		2018		570,962		–		999,987		1,000,002		640,000		–		29,260		3,240,211
Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer		2017		557,308		–		850,002		849,999		319,000		–		52,953		2,629,262
		2016		266,539		100,000		861,394		1,200,004		191,000		–		101,990		2,720,927
Daniel Pryor		2018		544,615		–		1,874,996		1,875,004		532,000		–		64,249		4,890,864
Executive Vice President, Strategy and Business Development		2017		525,962		500,000		874,983		874,997		382,000		–		52,078		3,210,019
		2016		515,000		–		–		–		342,000		–		45,360		902,360
Shyam Kambeyanda		2018		505,000		330,000		599,992		599,999		460,000		–		96,121		2,591,112
Senior Vice President, Colfax and ESAB President		2017		485,000		330,000		499,985		500,000		340,000		–		296,938		2,451,923
		2016		304,596		589,000		1,594,944		225,000		–		–		71,585		2,785,125
Ian Brander		2018		398,000	(7)	–		650,012		349,999		355,000	(8)	(5,094)		82,198		1,830,115
Senior Vice President, Colfax and Howden President		2017		414,462		–		499,985		500,000		137,981		90,634		66,995		1,710,056

(1)	For Mr. Trerotola, the amount representsamounts in this column for 2017 and 2016 represent the final two of the three installment payments of his cash signing bonus.bonus agreed to in 2015 when he joined the company. See “2015 CEO Succession” on pages 16-17 of our 2016 Proxy Statement as filed with the SEC on April 1, 2016. Similarly, for Mr. Hix, the amount represents his 2016 cash signing bonus. For Mr. Brannan,Pryor the amount represents a performance-related bonus paidfor 2017 in lieurecognition of a long-term incentive awardhis contributions to the successful completion of the Colfax Fluid Handling sale. For Mr. Kambeyanda, the amounts represent for each2018 and 2017 the second and third of 2015 and 2016five installment payments of his cash signing bonus and for 2016, the pro ratafirst installment of such signing bonus payment at target foras well as his service during the fiscal year as agreed upon his retirement. For Messrs. Hix and Kambeyanda, the amount represents the respective cash signing bonuses paid in 2016 as negotiated upon their hire and for Mr. Kambeyanda also represents the full-year annual bonus at target as agreed upon onat the time of his hire.hiring.
(2)	Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of grants made to each named executive officer,NEO, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 1112 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017. Amounts reflect the grant date fair values for awards of PRSUs, and, for Messrs. Hix and Kambeyanda, PRSUs and RSUs, which were based upon the maximum achievement levels for these awards.21, 2019. For 2016, for these2018 grants, the number of PRSUs or RSUs(or, for Mr. Brander, PRSUs and RSUs) granted to each executive was determined by dividing 50% of the executive’s target aggregate long-term incentive value (or for Messrs. Hix and Kambeyandacalculating the negotiated value of their transition bonus amounts and long-term incentive PRSU or RSU grants) by a 15-day average closing price preceding the date of Compensation Committee approval, to avoid the potential volatility impact of using a single-day closing price.award amount in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See “Long-Term Incentives” above on page 31.29. Assuming the maximum acheivement of the performance goals applicable to the PRSUs, the grant date value of the PRSUs granted to the NEOs in 2018 would have been $1,999,974, $3,749,992, $1,199,984, and $698,000 for Messrs. Hix, Pryor, Kambeyanda, and Brander respectively.
(3)	Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of grants made to each named executive officer,NEO, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 1112 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2017.21, 2019. For Mr. Trerotola’s grant in January 2016, the number of options granted was determined by dividing the target value of the option grant by a percentage of the 15-day average closing price preceding the date of Compensation Committee approval using assumptions consistent with those used for the Company’s prior CEO grants. For the other2018 grants, made in 2016 the number of options was determined by dividing 50% of the executive’s target aggregate long-term incentive value (or for Messrs. Hix and Kambeyanda the negotiated value of their long-term incentive stock option award) by the Black Scholes-based option value based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of date.grant. The exercise price for stock option awards equals the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. See “Long-Term Incentives” above on page 31.29.
(4)	Amounts represent the payouts pursuant to our Annual Incentive Plan. For a discussion of the performance metrics on which the 20162018 Annual Incentive Plan was based, including the weighting for each performance metric and the actual percentage achievement of the financial performance targets, see “Annual Incentive Plan” above on page 28.26.
(5)	Amount represents -£4,000 or -$5,094 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018. This amount is the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of Mr. Brander’s accumulated benefit under a closed pension benefit plan from the pension plan measurement date used for financial statement reporting purposes in fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2018. For additional details regarding this plan, see the Pension Benefits table and narrative that follows such table below.

- 2019 Proxy Statement

35

(5)

Back to Contents

(6)	Amounts set forth in this column for 20162018 consist of the following:

Name	Company 401(k)/Deferred Compensation Plan Match and Contribution ($)(a)	Auto Allowance ($)(b)	Financial Services ($)(c)	Aircraft Usage ($)(d)	Relocation ($)(e)	Total ($)
Mr. Trerotola	95,920	18,574	12,349	188,094	—	334,937
Mr. Hix	22,292	—	—	—	79,698	101,990
Mr. Brannan	41,774	—	—	—	—	55,102
Mr. Pryor	45,360	—	—	—	—	45,360
Mr. Kambeyanda	15,900	—	—	—	55,685	71,585
Ms. Puckett	35,460	—	—	—	—	35,460
Ms. Clark	32,460	—	—	—	—	32,460

	Name	Company 401(k)/Deferred Compensation Plan Match and Contribution ($)(a)	Auto Allowance ($)(b)	Financial Services ($)(c)	Aircraft Usage ($)(d)	Relocation ($)(e)	Supplemental Long-Term Disability Premiums ($)(f)	Accident Insurance ($)(g)	Howden Retirement Plan Company Contribution ($)(h)	Medical Care Supplement ($)(i)	Total ($)
	Mr. Trerotola	113,406	20,000	10,015	279,505	–	–	–	–	–	422,927
	Mr. Hix	29,260	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	29,260
	Mr. Pryor	52,078	–	8,652	–	–	–	–	–	–	64,249
	Mr. Kambeyanda	43,890	–	4,500	–	41,221	–	–	–	–	96,121
	Mr. Brander	–	15,283	–	–	–	7,183	232	41,181	3,036	82,198

	(a)	Amounts represent the aggregate Company match and Company contribution made by Colfax during 20162018 to such officer’sNEO’s 401(k) plan account, Excess Benefit Plan account and/orand Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan account. See the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table and accompanying narrative for additional information on the Excess Benefit Plan and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.
(b)	AmountFor Mr. Trerotola, amount represents Companyan annual cash allowance for car-related expenses pursuant to his employment contract. For Mr. Brander, the amount represents an annual cash allowance for personal carcar-related expenses pursuant to his service usage and Mr. Trerotola’s car allowance usage as reimbursed bycontract in the Company during 2016.amount of £12,000 or $15,283 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018.
(c)	Amount represents amounts for financial planning services as reimbursed by the Company during 2016.2018.
(d)	Amount represents Company expenses incurred for private plane usage in 2016.2018. The Company is billed directly for the charter flight services used for Mr. Trerotola’s personal travel. The imputed income to Mr. Trerotola for these flights as calculated under the tax rules was $16,826$38,932 in 2016,2018, based on the SIFL rates promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company does not gross-up or make whole Mr. Trerotola for the income imputed to his use of chartered flights.
(e)	AmountAmounts represents relocation expenses reimbursed by the Company pursuant to the terms of his hire, which include such costs as temporary housing, storage, and relocation assistance.
	(f)	Amount represents £5,640, or $7,183 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018.
	(g)	Amount represents £182, or $232 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018.
	(h)	Amount represents the annual employer contribution of £32,335, or $41,181 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018. So long as Mr. Brander contributes 5% of his annual salary to the retirement plan, as he did during 2018, Howden contributes 10% of Mr. Brander’s annual salary. Mr. Brander does not have the ability to withdraw funds from this account before retirement and upon his retirement Mr. Brander will receive the value of his investments in the fund. There is no guaranteed distribution amount based on service years or age. Amounts contributed to the retirement plan are at risk and are invested via direction from Mr. Brander to the plan provider.
	(i)	Amount represents a transition-related inducement for these hires during 2016.private medical insurance premium and executive physical of £2,383 in aggregate, or $3,035 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018.

(7)	For Mr. Brander, amount represents £312,500 or $398,000 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018.
(8)	For Mr. Brander, amount represents £273,000 or $355,000 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018.

 

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	37
	36

Back to Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 20162018

 

The following table sets forth information with respect to grants of plan-based awards to our named executive officers during 2016:2018:

 

						Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)						All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units Underlying Shares (#)(3)		All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)(4)		Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(5)
Name		Award Type		Grant Date		Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)		Threshold (#)		Target (#)		Maximum (#)
Matthew L.		Annual Incentive Plan		—		300,000		1,200,000		3,000,000
Trerotola		PRSUs		1/4/2016								—		128,755		—								3,056,644
		Stock Options		1/4/2016																559,563		23.74		5,461,355
Christopher M.		Annual Incentive Plan		—		55,000		220,000		550,000
Hix		PRSUs		7/1/2016								—		14,414		—								382,836
		Stock Options		7/1/2016																124,611		26.56		1,200,004
		RSUs		7/1/2016														18,018		—		—		478,558
Daniel A. Pryor		Annual Incentive Plan		—		103,000		412,000		1,030,000
Shyam		PRSUs		5/13/2016								—		15,756		—								393,270
Kambeyanda		Stock Options		5/13/2016																24,644		24.96		225,000
		RSUs		5/13/2016														48,144		—		—		1,201,674
A. Lynne		Annual Incentive Plan		—		67,500		270,000		675,000
Puckett		PRSUs		2/15/2016								—		17,575		—								438,496
		Stock Options		2/15/2016																43,860		24.95		400,003
Lynn H. Clark		Annual Incentive Plan		—		62,500		250,000		625,000
		PRSUs		2/15/2016								—		15,378		—								383,681
		Stock Options		2/15/2016																38,377		24.95		349,998

			Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)				Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)			All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying	Exercise or Base Price of Option	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and
			Threshold	Target	Maximum		Threshold	Target	Maximum	Options	Awards	Option
Name	Award Type	Grant Date	($)	($)	($)		(#)	(#)	(#)	(#)(3)	($/Sh)	Awards ($)(4)
Matthew L. Trerotola	Annual Incentive Plan	–	330,000	1,320,000	3,300,000
Christopher M. Hix	Annual Incentive Plan	–	115,000	460,000	1,150,000
	PRSUs	3/08/2018					14,742	29,485	58,970			999,987
	Stock Options	3/08/2018								96,712	33.41	1,000,002
Daniel A. Pryor	Annual Incentive Plan	–	110,000	440,000	1,100,000
	PRSUs	3/08/2018					27,642	55,285	110,570			1,874,996
	Stock Options	3/08/2018								181,335	33.41	1,875,004
Shyam Kambeyanda	Annual Incentive Plan	–	95,500	382,500	956,500
	PRSUs	3/08/2018					8,845	17,691	35,382			599,992
	Stock Options	3/08/2018								58,027	33.41	599,999
Ian Brander	Annual Incentive Plan(5)	–	76,416	305,664	764,160
	PRSUs	3/08/2018					5,160	10,320	20,640			349,999
	RSUs(6)	3/08/2018						9,144				300,012
	Stock Options	3/08/2018								33,849	33.41	350,000

(1)	Amounts represent the possible payouts under our Annual Incentive Plan. Threshold estimated possible payouts incorporate a 0.5 individual performance factor,IPF, target estimated possible payouts incorporate a 1.0 individual performance factorIPF and maximum estimated possible payouts incorporate the 250% maximum payout cap under the Annual Incentive Plan. For a discussion of the performance metrics and actual results and payouts under the plan for fiscal 20162018 see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table above, respectively. For Mr. Hix, amounts reflect proration from his hire date. Mr. Kambeyanda received a full-year bonus at target as agreed upon on his hire and Mr. Brannan received a pro rata bonus payment at target for his service during the fiscal year as agreed upon his retirement, each as included in the “Bonus” column of the Summary Compensation Table above.
(2)	Amounts represent potential shares issued under performance-based sharerestricted stock unit awards. The PRSUs may be earned at the end of the performance period upon certification by the Compensation Committee thatof the performance metric hadlevel that has been met. Earned awards are then subjectmet and cliff vest at the end of the three-year performance period, if earned. Once vested, at least 50% of the shares delivered pursuant to the PRSUs (net of shares withheld or sold for taxes) must be held for an additional service-based vestingone-year period. For Mr. Trerotola, the award vest ratably over three years, beginning on the third anniversary of the grant date, based on continued service. For the other named executive officers, vesting occurs in equal amounts on the third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date pending continued service with the Company.
(3)	For Messrs. Hix and Kambeyanda, amounts represent the restricted stock award portions of their respective signing bonuses and, for Mr. Kambeyanda, initial long-term incentive award. For Mr. Hix, the 18,018 RSUs vest ratably over three years, beginning on the third anniversary of the grant date. For Mr. Kambeyanda, 40,266 RSUs vest ratably over two years, beginning on the third anniversary of the grant date, and 7,878 RSUs vest ratably over three years, beginning on the second anniversary of the grant date.
(4)	For Mr. Trerotola, amounts represent stock option awards that vest ratably over three years, beginning on the third anniversary of the grant date, based on continued service. For the grants to the other named executive officers, amountsAmounts represent stock option awards that vest ratably over three years, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, based on continued service.
(5)(4)	The amounts shown in this column represent the full grant date fair value of grants made to each named executive officer,NEO, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. PRSUs are valued based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions associated with these awards as of the grant date and such calculation is consistent with the estimate of aggregate compensation cost recognized over the service period determined as of the grant date under FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures.
(5)	For Mr. Brander, amount represents £60,000, £240,000, and £600,000 for the threshold, target, and maximum possible payouts, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018.
(6)	Amounts represent restricted stock units that vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant date.

 

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	38
	37

Back to Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20162018 Fiscal Year-End

 

The following table shows, as of December 31, 2016,2018, the number of outstanding stock options, performance-based restricted stock unit awards and, for Messrs. Trerotola, Hix, Kambeyanda, and Kambeyanda,Brander, restricted stock unit awards held by the named executive officers:

 

																	Option Awards					Stock Awards
		Option Awards								Stock Awards												Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Name		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date(1)		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(3)		Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(4)		Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(5)	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable	Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date(1)		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2)	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(3)	Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(4)	Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(5)
Matthew L. Trerotola		—		538,600		39.54		7/23/2022									179,553	359,067	39.54	7/23/2022
		—		559,563		23.74		1/3/2023									–	559,563	23.74	1/3/2023
										31,614		1,135,891		—		—						204,628	4,276,725	–
										—		—		242,564		8,715,325
Christopher M. Hix		—		124,611		26.56		6/30/2023									83,074	41,537	26.56	6/30/2023
										18,018		647,387		—		—
										—		—		14,414		517,895
C. Scott Brannan		59,713		—		15.70		10/17/2017
		17,226		—		21.77		2/23/2018
		15,801		—		35.60		2/22/2019									23,869	47,740	40.47	2/12/2024
		13,314		—		42.25		2/17/2020									96,712		33.41	3/7/2025
		15,670		7,835		51.17		11/30/2021														26,426	552,303	–
										8,485		304,866		—		—						–		50,513	1,055,722
Daniel A. Pryor		53,333		—		18.75		1/2/2018									18,785	–	35.60	2/22/2019
		17,226		—		21.77		2/23/2018									23,669	–	42.25	2/17/2020
		18,785		—		35.60		2/22/2019									144,648	–	52.79	7/28/2020
		23,669		—		42.25		2/17/2020									39,336	78,674	52.02	2/15/2022
		—		144,648		52.79		7/28/2020									114,613	–	26.51	11/15/2022
		—		118,010		52.02		2/15/2022									24,571	49,144	40.47	2/12/2024
		38,204		76,409		26.51		11/15/2022									–	181,335	33.41	3/7/2025
										32,514		1,168,228		—		—						14,373	300,396	–
										—		—		63,559		2,283,675						–		90,098	1,883,048
Shyam Kambeyanda		—		24,644		24.96		5/12/2023									16,429	8,215	24.96	5/12/2023
										48,144		1,729,814		—		—	14,040	28,083	40.47	2/12/2024
										—		—		15,756		566,113	–	58,027	33.41	3/7/2025
A. Lynne Puckett		14,355		—		21.77		2/23/2018
																						61,274	1,280,627	–
																						–		30,060	628,254
Ian Brander																	7,022	–	35.60	2/22/2019
		14,923		—		35.60		2/22/2019									14,793	–	42.25	2/17/2020
		13,018		—		42.25		2/17/2020									15,024	–	68.23	2/16/2021
		12,019		8,012		68.23		2/16/2021									27,043	54,089	52.02	2/15/2022
		9,171		18,344		52.02		2/15/2022									57,307	–	26.51	11/15/2022
		14,326		28,654		26.51		11/15/2022									14,040	28,083	40.47	2/12/2024
		—		43,860		24.95		2/14/2023									–	33,849	33.41	3/7/2025
										10,263		368,750		—		—						16,331	341,318	–
										—		—		40,230		1,445,464						–		22,689	474,200
Lynn H. Clark		14,675				42.25		2/17/2020
		9,014		6,009		68.23		2/16/2021
		7,408		14,816		52.02		2/15/2022
		19,102		38,205		26.51		11/15/2022
		—		38,377		24.95		2/14/2023
										5,130		184,321		—		—
										—		—		39,068		1,403,713
										—		—		44,298		1,034,358

 

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	39
	38

Back to Contents

(1)

The vesting date of unvested stock option awards is set forth beside each option expiration date in the following chart. Note that the vesting date provided reflects when the options fully vest. Stock option awards vest ratably over three years beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date except as follows: For Mr. Pryor, options granted on July 29, 2013, vest in equal amounts on the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date and his options granted on February 16, 2015 vest in equal amounts on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. For Mr. Trerotola, options granted on July 24, 2015 and January 4, 2016, vest in equal amounts on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. For Messrs. Pryor and Brander, the options granted on February 16, 2015 vest in equal amounts on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date.

	Option Grant Date		Option Expiration Date		Option Full Vesting Date (options vest over three year period except as noted above)
	10/18/2010		10/17/2017		10/18/2013
	1/3/2011		1/2/2018		1/3/2014
	2/24/2011		2/23/2018		2/24/2014
	2/23/2012		2/22/2019		2/23/2015
	2/18/2013		2/17/2020		2/18/2016
	7/29/2013		7/28/2020		7/29/2018
	2/17/2014		2/16/2021		2/17/2017
	12/1/2014		11/30/2021		12/1/2017
	2/16/2015		2/15/2022		2/16/2020
	7/24/2015		7/23/2022		7/24/2020
	11/16/2015		11/15/2022		11/16/2018
	1/4/2016		1/3/2023		1/4/2021
	2/15/2016		2/14/2023		2/15/2019
	5/13/2016		5/12/2023		5/13/2019
	7/1/2016		7/6/30/2023		7/1/2019
	2/14/2017	2/12/2024	2/13/2020
	3/8/2018	3/7/2025	3/8/2021

(2)	For all named executive officers other than Messrs. Trerotola,Mr. Hix, the amounts represent (i) 12,012 restricted stock units that are the remaining portion of the RSU portion of his 2016 signing bonus, which vests two equal portions on July 1, 2019 and Kambeyanda, these amounts reflectJuly 1, 2020 and (i) 14,414 PRSUs that were earned upon certification by the Compensation Committee that the performance metric for these awards had been met. They are subject to an additional service-based vesting period, pursuant to which vesting will occurmet and that vest in two equal amounts on the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date as follows: Mr. Brannan– 3,160 granted on February 23, 2012 and 5,325 granted on February 18, 2013; Mr. Pryor– 3,757 granted on February 23, 2012, 9,467 granted on February 18, 2013, and 19,290 granted July 19, 2013; Ms. Puckett– 2,985 granted on February 23, 2012, 5,207 granted on February 23, 2012, and 2,071 grantedinstallments on July 19, 2013; Ms. Clark– 4,686 granted on February 18, 2013. For Ms. Clark, her amount also included 444 unvested RSUs1, 2019 and July 1, 2020 pending continued service with a February 18, 2018 vesting date. �� the Company.
	For Mr. Trerotola this amount reflects 31,614 restricted stock units received as part of his long-term incentive award made in connection with his appointment as an executive officer ofPryor, the Companyamounts represent 14,373 PRSUs that will vest on December 31, 2017, subject toNovember 16, 2019 pending continued service. For Messrs. Hix and Kambeyanda, amounts representservice with the restricted stock award portions of their respective signing bonuses and, for Mr. Kambeyanda, initial long-term incentive award. For Mr. Hix, the 18,018 RSUs vest ratably over three years, beginning on the third anniversary of the grant date (July 1, 2016). Company.
	For Mr. Kambeyanda, 40,266the amounts represent (i) 45,518 RSUs that vest ratably over two years, beginning on the third anniversary of the grant date, and 7,878 RSUs vest ratably over three years, beginning on the second anniversary of the grant date (each having a May 13, 2019, which is the outstanding restricted stock unit award portions of his 2016 grant date). signing bonus and (ii) 15,756 PRSUs from his intiial long-term incentive award that were earned upon certification by the Compensation Committee that the performance metric for these awards had been met and that vest in two equal installments on May 13, 2019 and May 13, 2020 pending continued service with the Company.
(3)	For Mr. Brander, the amounts represent (i) 9,144 RSUs that vest on March 8, 2019 and (ii) 7,187 PRSUs that will vest on November 16, 2019 pending continued service with the Company.
(3)	The amounts shown in this column represent the market value of the unvested PRSUs or restricted stock units, as applicable, based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 30, 2016,31, 2018, which was $35.93$20.90 per share, multiplied by the number of units, respectively, for each unvested award.
(4)	The amounts shown in this column reflect unearned PRSUs as of December 31, 2016. Once2018. If earned, these PRSUs are then subject to an additional service-based vesting period. For Mr. Trerotola, the awards, if earned, would vest ratably over three years, beginning on July 24, 2018
	The remaining amounts for 113,809 PRSUsMessrs. Pryor and January 4, 2019Brander and for 128,755 PRSUs, based on continued service. For theall other named executive officers, forNEOs reflect awards made beginning in November 2015 (Pryor– 28,7462017 and 2018 and show the target amount of PRSUs granted November 16, 2015; Hix– 14,414 PRSUs granted July 1, 2016; Kambeyanda– 15,756 PRSUs granted May 13, 2016; Puckett– 10,780 PRSUs granted November 16, 2015, 17,575 PRSUs granted February 15, 2016, Clark– 14,373 granted November 16, 2015, 15,378 granted February 15, 2016) vesting occurs in two equal amounts onthat may be earned at the third and fourth anniversariesend of the grant date pending continued service withperformance period upon certification by the CompanyCompensation Committee, which awards would cliff vest at the end of the three-year performance period, if earned. Once vested, at least 50% of the shares delivered pursuant to the PRSUs (net of shares withheld or sold for taxes) must be held for an additional one-year period. For 2018, these amounts are reflected in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2018” table above under the column “Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards” and for awards2017 are reflected in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2017” table in the Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting.
	PRSU grants made prior to NovemberMessrs. Pryor and Brander in February 2015 (Pryor– 34,813 PRSUs granted February 16, 2015; Puckett– 4,804 PRSUs granted February 17, 2014, 7,071 PRSUs granted February 16, 2015; Clark– 3,606 granted February 14, 2014, 5,711 granted February 16, 2015), vesting will occur in two equal installments onwere cancelled without any shares being issued following the fourth and fifth anniversariesend of their performance period, which concluded as of the grant date, contingent on continued employment withend of the Company.fiscal year, and are not reflected in this table.
(5)	The amounts shown in this column represent the market value of the unearned PRSUs based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2016,2018, which was $20.90 per share, multiplied by the number of units, respectively, for each unvested and unearned performance stock award.

 

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	40
	39

Back to Contents

Employment Agreements and Executive Officer Severance Plan

 

Messrs. Trerotola and Pryor and Ms. Puckett are party to our current form of employment agreement for executive officers, which was adopted by the Company on September 15, 2010.

 

Mr. Hix’s letter agreement, entered into upon his hire, provides for severance and change in control benefits primarily commensurate with those provided inunder our employment agreements. Mr. Kambeyanda is party to a letter agreement that specifies his starting annual salary and minimum target bonus. Mr. Brander is party to a service agreement with Howden Group Ltd., which he entered into prior to our acquisition of the Howden business in 2012.

 

During 2013 we adoptedWe also maintain an Executive Officer Severance Plan, which provides for severance benefits upon a termination without cause or a resignation for good reason for executive officers who are not otherwise contractually entitled to severance compensation. The Executive Officer Severance Plan does not provide for change in control benefits. Mr. Kambeyanda and Ms. Clark areis the only named executive officersNEO subject to this plan.

 

Form of Employment Agreement

 

On September 15, 2010, the Company adopted a new form of employment agreement for executive officers. Messrs. Trerotola and Pryor and Ms. Puckett are alleach parties to employment agreements based on this form, which, except for Mr. Trerotola (who has a three-year term), currently havehas a two-year term that is automatically extended unless the Board or the executive provides written notice to terminate the automatic extension provision. In addition, in the event we undergo a “change in control” (as described below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control”) during the term of the employment agreements, the agreements will be automatically extended to the second anniversary of the change in control. Each officer’s base salary may not be reduced below the amount previously in effect without the written agreement of the executive.

 

With respect to the benefits payable to each executive under these agreements upon a change in control of Colfax, the benefits are only paid upon a “double trigger,” meaning a change in control event must occur and the executive must either be terminated without cause by Colfax (or its successor) or the executive must resign for good reason. In entering into these arrangements, the Company wanted to ensure the continued dedication of these executive officers, notwithstanding the possibility of a change in control, and to retain such officerofficers in our employ after any such transaction. We believe that, should the possibility of a change in control arise, Colfax should be able to receive and rely upon our officers’ advice as to the best interests of the Company and without the concern that such officer might be distracted by the personal uncertainties and risks created by athe potential change in control. In the event, however, that such officer is actually terminated during the period beginning three months prior to a change in control event or within a certain period of time following the change in control (or prior to the end of the term of the applicable employment agreement should the change of control not be consummated), which termination may be out of their control (i.e., by the successor company or management), we believe that the officers should be compensated for their efforts in positioning Colfax for the possibility of an acquisition event. Further, any bonus payment paid in conjunction with the termination of a named executive officerNEO will be based upon the performance of the Company, as stipulated in the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan. Additional information on certain benefits provided inunder the form of employment agreement in certain terminations or in connection with a change of control is discussed below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

 

The following table provides information regarding (i) the vesting of earned PRSUs for (i) Ms. Puckett’s option exercise during 2016,Messrs. Trerotola, Pryor, and Brander, (ii) the vesting of the second tranche or Mr. Trerotola’s new hire RSU award on December 31, 2016, (iii) the vesting of PRSUsawards for Messrs. BrannanHix and PryorKambeyanda, and Mses. Puckett and Clark and the vesting of RSUs for Ms. Clark.(iii) Mr. Pryor’s option exercises during 2018. The number of shares acquired upon exercise or vesting and the value realized before payment of any taxes and broker commissions is reflected below. Value realized represents the product of the number of shares received upon exercise or vesting and the closing market price of our common stock on the exercise or vesting date, less the exercise price for options. Mr. Hix and Mr. Kambeyanda realized no value from equity award exercises or vestings in 2016.

 

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	41
	40

Back to Contents

Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal 20162018

 

		Option Awards				Stock Awards			Option Awards			Stock Awards
Name		Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)		Value Realized on Exercise ($)		Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)		Value Realized on Vesting ($)	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)	Value Realized on Exercise ($)		Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)	Value Realized on Vesting ($)
Matthew Trerotola		N/A		N/A		31,613		1,135,891	N/A			37,936	1,279,581
Scott Brannan		N/A		N/A		6,605		167,316
Chris Hix									N/A			6,006	184,084
Daniel Pryor		N/A		N/A		7,202		182,414	17,226	200,855		28,752	858,746
Lynne Puckett		29,135		481,310		5,858		148,328
Lynn Clark		N/A		N/A		444		11,486
Shyam Kambeyanda									N/A			2,626	85,082
Ian Brander									N/A			10,145	299,569

 

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

 

Effective January 1, 2016, we established the Colfax Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Nonqualified Plan”) to provide certain select members of management and other highly compensated employees, including each of the named executive officers,NEOs, with an opportunity to defer a stated percentage of their base compensation or their bonus compensation without regard to the compensation limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code for our 401(k) plan. We established the Nonqualified Plan to allow these individuals to contribute toward retirement on a tax-effective basis in a manner that is consistent with other Colfax employees who are not limited by the Internal Revenue Code limits. The plan is “unfunded,” meaning there are no assets segregated for the exclusive benefit of plan participants.

 

The Nonqualified Plan allows the named executive officersNEOs to defer up to 50% of their base salaries and up to 75% of their bonus compensation. In addition, during 20162017 we matched up to 4% of all excess deferrals by the named executive officersNEOs and provided a 2% Company contribution. Our named executive officersNEOs vest in these Company contributions to the Nonqualified Plan on the same terms as under the Company’s 401(k) plan.

 

Deferrals under the Nonqualified Plan are notionally invested among a number of different mutual funds, insurance company separate accounts, indexed rates or other measurement funds, which are selected periodically by the plan administrator to best match the funds offered in the qualified 401(k) plan. Each participating named executive officerNEO can allocate his deferrals among these notional fund investment options and may change elections at any time by making a change of election with the plan administrator. Colfax notionally invests its match and contribution amounts in the same investment options in the same amounts and allocations as the reference funds selected by the officer.

 

Simultaneously with the executive’s election to defer amounts under the Nonqualified Plan, the executive must elect the time and form of payment for the deferred amounts, which may generally be either a lump sum distribution or in quarterly installments payable over a period of one to ten years following a specified date (that must be at least one year following the end of the year to which the officer’s deferral election relates) or at least six months following the officer’s separation from service. Limited changes to deferral elections are permitted in accordance with the terms of the Nonqualified Plan. If no election is made, the benefit will be paid in a lump sum on the last day of the month which occurs six months after the executive’s separation from service. Deferred amounts may alternatively be paid out in a lump sum in the event of an executive’s death or disability or in the event of an unforeseeable financial emergency, Furthermore, in the event the executive’s account balance at the time of his or her separation from service is less than $15,000, payment of the account balance will be made in a lump sum on or before the later of (i) December 31 of the calendar year of separation, or (ii) the date 2.5 months after the executive’s separation from service.

 

The Company also maintains the Colfax Corporation Excess Benefit Plan (the “Excess Benefit Plan”) which was frozen to new participants and future new deferrals on December 31, 2015, except for the future deferrals related previous deferral elections for fiscal year 2015 bonus payments made in February 2016.2015. Like the Nonqualified Plan, the Excess Benefit Plan is an unfunded non-qualified deferred compensation plan in which all of our named executive officers other than Messrs. Trerotola, Hix and Kembeyanda holdMr. Pryor holds an account balances. Like the Nonqualified Plan, amounts deferred under the Excess Benefit Plan are notionally invested in offered measurement funds as selected by the plan participant and will be distributed in accordance with participant elections and the terms of the Excess Benefit Plan following a participant’s separation from service, death or disability.

 

Mr. Brander does not participate in either the Nonqualified Plan or the Excess Benefit Plan.

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	42
	41

Back to Contents

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

 

Name		Executive Contributions in Last FY ($)(1)		Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($)(2)		Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)		Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)		Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($)(3)		Executive Contributions in Last FY ($)(1)		Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($)(2)		Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)		Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)		Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($)
Matthew L. Trerotola		50,000		80,020		7,994		—		138,014		96,500		99,300		21,864		–		480,845
Christopher M. Hix		9,508		6,392		141		—		16,041		12,760		15,794		3,540		–		116,206
C. Scott Brannan		23,407		25,874		10,525		—		255,176
Daniel A. Pryor		45,400		29,460		26,099		—		377,789		55,597		39,097		25,515		–		617,852
A. Lynne Puckett		112,900		19,600		50,906		—		547,756
Lynn H. Clark		32,460		16,600		5,865		—		104,438
Shyam Kambeyanda												25,250		34,291		10,890		–		226,589

 

(1)	With respect to each applicable named executive officer,NEO, amounts represent deferred salary and deferred bonus amounts granted that are reported in the Summary Compensation Table above under the applicable column.
(2)	All amounts reported in this column for each applicable named executive officerNEO are reported in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table above.

Pension Benefits- Mr. Brander

Mr. Brander previously participated in a pension plan provided by Howden Group Ltd., the Howden Group Pension Plan. Members of the Howden Group Pension Plan stopped accruing benefits on September 30, 2006. The pension amount available to each participant under the Howden Group Pension Plan is based on the participant’s years of service and his or her “Final Pensionable Earnings.” For purposes of the Howden Group Pension Plan, “Final Pensionable Earnings” means the participant’s base annual salary as of the date accrualsceased under the Howden Group Pension Plan, plus an allowance for fluctuating earnings for overtime and shift allowances, less an amount equal to 1.5 times the Lower Earnings Limit (a figure determined by the UK tax authorities).

The pension formula under the plan is one sixtieth of the Final Pensionable Earnings multiplied by the number years of pensionable service for each participant.

All pension amounts under the Howden Group Pension Plan are paid monthly following retirement.

2018 Pension Benefits

Name		Plan Name		Number of Years Credited Service (#)(1)		Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)(2)			Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($)
Ian Brander		Howden Group Pension Plan		19.4		668,640	(3)		–

(1)	Represents the number of years of pensionable service for Mr. Brander under the Howden Group Pension Plan. The number of years of pensionable service represents Mr. Brander’s actual years of service with the company prior to the plan freeze date in 2006.
(3)(2)	WithAmounts represent the actuarial present value of Mr. Brander’s accumulated benefit under the plan, computed as of the date used for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to each applicable named executive officer’s aggregate balance,our 2017 financial statements and assuming the following amounts are reportednormal plan retirement age of 65. The value quoted is the full Howden Group Pension Plan transfer value that would be paid in full upon transfer to Mr. Brander.
(3)	Amount represents £525,000 or $668,640 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the Summary Compensation Tableexchange rate in 2016 or prior years: Mr. Trerotola— $138,014, Mr. Hix— $15,900, Mr. Brannan— $129,890, Mr. Pryor— $205,590, Ms. Puckett— $132,500, Ms. Clark— $49,060.effect on December 31, 2018.

 

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

 

The information below describes relevant employment agreement, severance plan and equity plan provisions for payments upon termination or change in control and sets forth the amount of compensation that could have been received by each of the named executive officersNEOs in the event such executive’s employment had terminated under the various applicable triggering events described below as of December 31, 2016. The actual amounts received by Mr. Brannan in connection with his retirement are described above under “2016 Management Succession.” Mr. Brannan is entitled to no additional severance amounts upon his termination of part-time employment status.2018. The benefits discussed below are in addition to those generally available to all salaried employees, such as distributions under the 401(k) plan, Howden Group Pension Plan, health care benefits and disability benefits or vested amounts payable under the Nonqualified Plan and Excess Benefit Plan described above. In addition, these benefits do not take into account any arrangements that we may provide in connection with an actual separation from service or a change in control. Due to the number of different factors that affect the nature and amount of any benefits provided in connection with these events, actual amounts payable to any of the named executive officersNEOs should a separation from service or change-in-control occur during the year will likely differ, perhaps significantly, from the amounts reported below. Factors that could affect such amounts include the timing during the year of the event, the Company’s stock price, and the target amounts payable under annual and long-term incentive arrangements that are in place at the time of the event.

 

- 2019 Proxy Statement

42

Back to Contents

Employment Agreements

 

Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreements with each of Messrs. Trerotola and Pryor, and Ms. Puckett, each executive is entitled to the following severance payments or benefits in the event his or her employment is terminated by us without “cause” or the executive resigns for “good reason” (each as described below):

 

■	For Mr. Trerotola, the (i) payment of his base salary then in effect for 24 months following termination, (ii) an amount equal to 200% of his target annual incentive bonus for the year of termination paid in equal installments over the 24 months following termination, and (iii) COBRA coverage for 24 months or until he becomes eligible for coverage by another company or is no longer eligible for COBRA;
■	For Mr. Pryor, and Ms. Puckett, a lump sum payment equal to one times the executive’s base salary in effect and his or her target annual incentive compensation for the year of termination (or, if greater, the average of the two highest actual annual incentive payments made to the executive during the last three years); and
■	For each of Messrs. Trerotola and Pryor, and Ms. Puckett a lump sum payment equal to the executive’s pro rata annual incentive compensation for the year of termination subject to the performance criteria having been met for that year under the Annual Incentive Plan.

 

In the event the executive terminates employment without “cause” or for “good reason” within three months prior to a “change in control event” (as described below), or two years after a “change in control”, each executive is entitled to the following severance payments or benefits:

■	a lump sum payment equal to two times the executive’s base salary in effect and his or her target annual incentive compensation for the year of termination (or, if greater, the average of the two highest actual incentive payments made to the executive during the last three years);
■	a lump sum payment equal to the executive’s pro rata annual incentive compensation for the year of termination subject to the performance criteria having been met for that year under the Annual Incentive Plan; and
■	all equity awards will immediately vest, with any performance objectives applicable to performance-based equity awards deemed to have been met at the greater of (i) the target level at the date of termination, and (ii) actual performance at the date of termination.

 

- 2017 Proxy Statement	43

Back to Contents

In each case described above, the executive’s right to the severance payments and benefits is conditioned on the executive’s execution of a waiver and release agreement in favor of Colfax. In addition, each employment agreement contains standard confidentiality covenants, non-disparagement covenants, non-competition covenants and non-solicitation covenants.

 

In the event that any payment or benefit to the executives pursuant to the employment agreements or otherwise constitute excess parachute payments under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code such that they would trigger the excise tax provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, such payments are to be reduced so that the excise tax provisions are not triggered, but only upon determination by the executive that the after-tax value of the termination benefits calculated with the restriction described above exceed the value of those calculated without such restriction.

 

Each agreement further provides that, in the event it is determined that the willful actions of the executive have resulted in a material misstatement or omission in any report or statement filed by Colfax with the SEC, or material fraud against Colfax, Colfax is entitled to recover all or any portion of any award or payment made to the executive.

 

For purposes of the employment agreements, the following terms generally have the following meanings:

 

■	“cause”means conviction of a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude, willful commission of any act of theft, fraud, embezzlement or misappropriation against Colfax or its subsidiaries or willful and continued failure of the executive to substantially perform his or her duties;
■	“change in control”means:

	–	a transaction or series of transactions pursuant to which any person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 50% of the voting power of the common stock of Colfax then outstanding;
	–	during any two-year consecutive period, individuals who at the beginning of the period constitute the Board (together with any new directors approved by at least two-thirds of the directors at the beginning of the period or subsequently approved) cease to constitute a majority of the Board;
	–	a merger, sale of all or substantially all of the assets of Colfax or certain acquisitions of the assets or stock by Colfax of another entity in which there is a change in control of Colfax; or
	–	a liquidation or dissolution of Colfax.

■	“change in control event” means the earlier to occur of a “change in control” or the execution of an agreement by Colfax providing for a change in control.
■	“good reason” means:

	–	upon or following a change in control, the assignment to the executive of duties materially inconsistent with his or her position or any alteration of an executive’s duties, responsibilities and authorities, and then only if such adjustments or assignments are not the result of the conclusion by a significantly larger successor entity and its board of directors that such executive’s role needs to be altered;
	–	the requirement for the executive to relocate his or her principal place of business at least 35 miles from his or her current place of business;
	–	Colfax’s failure to obtain agreement from any successor to fully assume its obligations to the executive under the terms of the agreement; or
	–	any other failure by Colfax to perform its material obligations under, or breach of Colfax of any material provision of, the employment agreement.

 

Trerotola Pro-Rata Vesting Provisions

 

In addition, for Mr. Trerotola his CEO Performance Stock Unit Agreements provide that if he is terminated by the Company without “cause” (and not on account of disability) or resigns for “good reason” his outstanding performance-based equity awards shall vest pro-ratably only if the performance objectives are achieved as of the end of the performance period.

 

- 2019 Proxy Statement

43

Back to Contents

Hix Letter Agreement

 

Mr.  Hix is subject to a letter agreement entered into with the Company upon his hire. Pursuant to that letter agreement, severance in an amount equal to the sum of his base salary and target bonus is to be provided in the event of a termination without “cause” or for “good reason” or, with severance of two times such amount to be provided in connection with such a termination within three months prior to or two years after a “change in control” equivalent to that described above under our form of employment agreements, less the lump sum payment equal to the pro rata annual incentive compensation for the year of termination..

 

Executive Officer Severance Plan

 

Mr. Kambeyanda and Ms. Clark are participantsis a participant in our Executive Officer Severance Plan, which provides for severance benefits upon termination without cause or for good reason for executive officers who are not otherwise contractually entitled to severance compensation pursuant to a separate agreement with the Company. Severance provided in the event of termination without “cause” or for “good reason” (each defined as in the form of employment agreement) is a lump sum payment equal to one times the executive’s base salary in effect and a pro rata payment of his or her target annual incentive compensation for the year of termination. The Executive Officer Severance Plan does not provide for any additional change in control benefits.

 

Brander’s Service Agreement

If Mr. Brander’s service agreement is terminated without at least twelve month’s prior written notice he is entitled to payment of twelve month’s severance equivalent to his base salary in effect at that time.

Equity Awards

 

The vesting of outstanding equity awards, other than performance-based awards, accelerates in full upon the death or total and permanent disability of the grantee or, unless assumed or substituted as discussed below, upon a “corporate transaction” (as defined below). The vesting of the outstanding PRSUs accelerates in full upon the death or total and permanent disability of the grantee only if and when the performance criteria for such award are achieved as of the end of the performance period upon certification of the same by the Compensation Committee, or immediately if the performance period has already ended and the Compensation Committee has certified that the performance criteria have been achieved. The outstanding PRSUs will terminate and cease to

- 2017 Proxy Statement	44

Back to Contents

vest upon a “corporate transaction,” unless prior to the corporate transaction the achievement of the performance criteria is certified by the Compensation Committee, in which case the vesting for the award will accelerate in full unless assumed or substituted as discussed below. While these benefits are available to all of our equity plan participants equally, pursuant to SEC requirements, we have included these acceleration benefits in the table below. In addition, in the event of termination of service other than for death, disability or cause, any stock option awards will remain exercisable to the extent vested for 90 days after termination of service.

 

A “corporate transaction” under any outstanding equity awards is generally defined as:

 

■	the dissolution or liquidation of the Company or a merger, consolidation, or reorganization of the Company with one or more other entities in which we are not the surviving entity;
■	a sale of substantially all of our assets to another person or entity; or
■	any transaction which results in any person or entity, other than persons who are stockholders or affiliates immediately prior to the transaction, owning 50% or more of the combined voting power of all classes of our stock.

 

Accelerated vesting upon a “corporate transaction” will not occur to the extent that provision is made in writing in connection with the corporate transaction for the assumption or continuation of the outstanding awards, or for the substitution of such outstanding awards for similar awards relating to the stock of the successor entity, or a parent or subsidiary of the successor entity, with appropriate adjustments to the number of shares of stock that would be delivered and the exercise price, grant price or purchase price relating to any such award. If an award is assumed or substituted in connection with a corporate transaction and the holder is terminated without cause within a year following a change in control, the award will fully vest and may be exercised in full, to the extent applicable, beginning on the date of such termination and for the one-year period immediately following such termination or for such longer period as the compensation committee shall determine.

 

Estimate of Payments

 

The following table provides information related to compensation payable to each named executive officer (other than Mr. Brannan, who has retired from Colfax and whose payments and benefits actually received in connection with the same are described above under “2016 Management Succession” on page 27)NEO assuming termination of such executive’s employment on December 31, 2016,2018, or assuming a change of control or corporate transaction with corresponding qualifying termination occurred on December 31, 2016.2018. Amounts also assume the price of our common stock was $35.93,$20.90, the closing price on December 31, 2016.2018, the last trading day of the fiscal year.

 

- 2019 Proxy Statement

44

Back to Contents

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

 

Executive		Matthew L. Trerotola		Christopher M. Hix		Daniel A. Pryor		A. Lynne Puckett		Lynn H. Clark		Matthew L. Trerotola		Christopher M. Hix		Daniel A. Pryor		Shyam Kambeyanda		Ian Brander
Employment Agreement/Severance Plan Benefits:											Employment Agreement/Severance Plan Benefits:
Termination without “cause” or “good reason”
Payment Over 24 Months/Lump Sum Payment(1)		4,400,000		990,000		927,000		685,000		385,000		4,752,000		1,035,000		990,000		510,000		416,000	(5)
Pro Rata Incentive Compensation		1,200,000		220,000		412,000		270,000		250,000
Pro Rata Incentive Compensation(2)												1,320,000		–		440,000		382,500		–
Termination in connection with a “change of control”	Termination in connection with a “change of control”
Lump Sum Payment		4,400,000		1,980,000		1,854,000		1,370,000		385,000		4,752,000		2,070,000		1,980,000		510,000		416,000
Pro Rata Incentive Compensation		1,200,000		220,000		412,000		270,000		250,000
Pro Rata Incentive Compensation(2)												1,320,000		–		440,000		382,500		–
Accelerated Stock Options(2)		6,821,073		1,167,605		719,773		751,503		781,271		8,282,168		2,379,238		5,678,584		1,308,855		2,656,285
Accelerated PRSUs(3)		8,715,324		517,895		3,451,903		1,814,357		1,572,081		4,276,725		1,356,974		2,635,845		957,554		1,124,629
Accelerated RSUs(3)		2,271,782		647,387		—		—		31,903		–		251,051		–		951,326		191,110
NQDC Plans(4)		138,014		16,041		377,789		547,756		104,437
NQDC Plans/Pension(4)												480,845		116,206		617,852		226,589		668,640

(1)	For Mr. Trerotola, the amount is paid over the 24 months following termination. For the other named executive officers,NEOs, the amount is paid as a lump sum.
(2)	Assumes achievement at target.
(2)	In addition to accelerated vesting pursuant to the employment agreements, stock options accelerate upon death, total and permanent disability, and, unless assumed or substituted as discussed above, upon a “corporate transaction” as defined above. Mr. Brannan’s outstanding options would also be subject to this treatment.
(3)	Under the employment agreements, in the event of a termination in connection with a change in control, the performance objectives applicable to PRSUs will be deemed to have been met at the greater of (i) the target level at the date of termination, and (ii) actual performance at the date of termination. In addition to accelerated vesting pursuant to the employment agreements, RSUs, and PRSUs for which the performance criteria have been certified as achieved, accelerate upon death, total and permanent disability and, unless assumed or substituted as discussed above, upon a “corporate transaction” as defined above. Mr. Brannan’s outstanding PRSUs would also be subject to this treatment.
(4)	Amounts represent the aggregate balance of the named executive officer’sNEO’s Excess Benefit Plan or Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation account as of December 31, 2016.2018. For more details on these plans, see “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” above. For Mr. Brander, amount represents the transfer value of his accumulated pension benefit as of December 31, 2018. See “Pension Benefits- Mr. Brander” above.
(5)	Amount represents £320,000 or $416,000 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018.

 

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	45

Back to Contents

CEO PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our median compensated associate and the annual total compensation of Mr. Matthew Trerotola, our President & Chief Executive Officer. The pay ratio included in this section is a reasonable estimate calculated in a matter consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

For 2018:

■	The annual total compensation of the median compensated of all of our employees (other than our CEO) was $34,386; and
■	The annual total compensation of Mr. Trerotola, as presented in the Summary Compensation Table, was $3,147,927.

Based on this information, for 2018 the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Trerotola, our Chief Executive Officer, to the annual total compensation of our median compensated employee was 91.5 to one.

The SEC’s rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

To identify our median-compensated employee, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of this “median employee”:

■	We determined that, as of December 31, 2018, our employee population consisted of approximately 15,500 persons, of whom approximately 2,100 were employed in the United States and approximately 13,400 were employed outside the United States, based on our payroll records;
■	We selected December 31, 2018 as the date upon which we would identify the “median employee”;
■	We annualized the compensation of associates employed by us for less than a full fiscal year;
■	Based on payroll data for all employees aside from those noted as excluded above, we used annualized base salary or base pay rate to identify our median employee, who was a full-time, salaried associate in the Czech Republic; and
■	Once the median employee was identified, we calculated the elements of this employee’s compensation for 2018 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-X, resulting in annual total compensation of $34,386 based on the exchange rate in effect as of December 31, 2018.

- 2019 Proxy Statement

46

Back to Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

 

The following table summarizes Colfax Corporation’s equity plan information as of December 31, 2016.2018.

 

						Number of securities
		Number of				remaining available
		securities to				for future issuance
		be issued upon				under equity
		exercise of		Weighted-average		compensation plans
		outstanding		exercise price of		(excluding securities
		options and rights		outstanding options		reflected in column (a))
Plan Category		(a)		(b)(1)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by Company stockholders		5,539,041		$ 37.49		9,913,664
Equity compensation plans not approved by Company stockholders		0		0		0

Plan Category		Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights (a)(1)		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options (b)(2)		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column(a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by Company stockholders		6,034,400		$ 37.49		6,092,975.5
Equity compensation plans not approved by Company stockholders		0		0		0

(1)	The weighted average exercise price does not take into account the shares issuable upon outstanding RSUs vesting, which have no exercise price.
(2)	Includes 1,211,2141,142,633 shares granted under the either the 2016 or 2008 Plan that are issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units, including 627,316647,163 shares that could be issued at the end of the requisite performance period for outstanding performance-based restricted stock units. This number assumes shares will be issued at the maximum vesting amount for outstanding performance-based RSUs.
(2)	The weighted average exercise price does not take into account the shares issuable upon outstanding RSUs vesting, which have no exercise price.

 

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	46
	47

Back to Contents

Proposal 3

Approval of Named Executive Officers’ Compensation, on a Non-Binding Advisory Basis (“Say-on-Pay”)

 

We are asking our stockholders to cast an advisory vote at our Annual Meeting to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are asking that you vote on the following advisory resolution:

 

RESOLVED, that the 20162018 compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is herebyAPPROVEDAPPROVED..

 

Though the vote is non-binding, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors value your opinion and will consider the outcome of the vote in establishing our compensation philosophy and making future compensation decisions. At this time, we intend to seek stockholder approval of our executive compensation program on an annual basis.

 

WHY YOU SHOULD APPROVE OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

 

As discussed in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we believe our compensation programs and practices are appropriate and effective in implementing our compensation philosophy, and our focus remains on linking compensation to performance while aligning the interests of management with those of our stockholders. Further, we have evaluated our compensation program over the course of 2016 and implemented enhancements that are aligned with stockholder interests and enhance our pay for performance focus. These changes are more fully described in the “Compensation Discussion & Analysis” beginning on page 23.

 

VOTE REQUIRED

 

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes castshares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required to approve the advisory vote onapproving the compensation of our named executive officers.

 

BOARD RECOMMENDATION

 

The Board unanimously recommends that you voteFORProposal 3, which is advisory approval of Colfax’s named executive compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. We strongly urge stockholders to review our entire Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the accompanying tables, which provides complete information on the compensation awarded to the named executive officers and the reasoning supporting those awards.

 

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	47
	48

Back to Contents

Proposal 4

Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Say-on-Pay Votes

Section 14A of the Exchange Act provides our stockholders with the opportunity to recommend on an advisory basis how frequently we should conduct future advisory “say-on-pay” votes to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. In our last vote on the frequency of stockholder votes on executive compensation, held at our 2011 Annual Meeting, a majority (68% of the votes cast by our stockholders) voted for “say-on-pay” proposals to occur every three years, and in light of those voting results the Board of Directors had decided that the Company would hold an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers every three years. However, after recent engagement with our stockholders, the Board of Directors has now determined that an advisory vote to approve executive compensation that occurs each year is a more appropriate alternative for the Company and its stockholders at this time.

You are not being asked to approve the recommendation of the Board, but instead as provided for under SEC rules, we are asking you to vote, on a non-binding advisory basis, whether future say-on-pay votes should occur every one, two or three years. Although this vote is non-binding, our Board will consider stockholder opinion on this proposal.

VOTE REQUIRED

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast is required to approve the frequency with which stockholders will cast advisory votes at our annual meetings to approve named executive officer compensation. If none of the alternatives of every one year, two years or three years receives a majority vote, we will consider the highest number of votes cast by stockholders to be the frequency that has been recommended by stockholders.

BOARD RECOMMENDATION

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote forONE YEARwith respect to how frequently an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers should occur.

- 2017 Proxy Statement	48

Back to Contents

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK

 

The following table sets forth certain information as of March 22, 201726, 2019 (unless otherwise specified), with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each person who is known to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock, each person currently serving as a director, each

nominee for director, each named executive officer (as listed below), and all directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, to our knowledge, each person has sole dispositive and voting power over the shares in the table.

 

Beneficial Owner	Shares Beneficially Owned					Percent of Class
5% Holder and Director
Mitchell P. Rales			11,961,199	(1)			9.8	%
5% Holders
Steven M. Rales			12,065,749	(2)			9.8	%
BDT Capital Partners, LLC			11,052,187	(3)			9.0	%
Principal Global Investors, LLC			8,189,253	(4)			6.7	%
The Vanguard Group			6,604,418	(5)			5.3	%
Directors
Patrick W. Allender			279,887	(6)(7)				*
Thomas S. Gayner			56,088	(7)				*
Rhonda L. Jordan			82,840	(7)(8)				*
San W. Orr, III			22,443	(7)				*
A. Clayton Perfall			40,242	(7)(9)				*
Rajiv Vinnakota			33,106	(7)				*
Sharon Wienbar			845	(7)				*
Named Executive Officers and Directors
Matthew L. Trerotola			29,242					*
Named Executive Officers
Christopher M. Hix			0					*
C. Scott Brannan			64,303	(10)(11)(12)(15)				*
Daniel A. Pryor			180,063	(10)(13)(15)				*
Shyam Kambeyanda			8,214	(10)(15)				*
A. Lynne Puckett			117,799	(10)(14)(15)				*
Lynn H. Clark			72,886	(10)(15)				*
All of our directors and executive officers as a group (18 persons)			13,121,586	(10)			10.6	%

Beneficial Owner	Shares Beneficially Owned		Percent of Class
5% Holder and Director
Mitchell P. Rales	12,592,707	(1)	10.6	%
5% Holders
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.	13,988,736	(2)	11.9	%
Steven M. Rales	11,690,749	(3)	9.9	%
BDT Capital Partners, LLC	11,054,191	(4)	9.4	%
Principal Global Investors, LLC	7,028,102	(5)	5.9	%
The Vanguard Group	7,013,703	(6)	5.9	%
Directors
Patrick W. Allender	298,540	(7)(8)	*
Thomas S. Gayner	73,890	(8)	*
Rhonda L. Jordan	101,493	(8)(9)	*
A. Clayton Perfall	59,197	(8)(10)	*
Rajiv Vinnakota	45,334	(8)	*
Didier Teirlinck	12,533	(8)	*
Sharon Wienbar	22,351	(8)	*
Named Executive Officers and Directors
Matthew L. Trerotola	262,036		*
Named Executive Officers
Christopher M. Hix	169,056		*
Daniel A. Pryor	549,297	(11)(12)	*	��
Shyam Kambeyanda	104,457	(11)(13)	*
Ian Brander	143,402	(11)(14)	*
All of our directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons)	14,443,231	(11)	12.0%

*	Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%
(1)	Includes 10,000,00010,262,869 shares ownedheld directly and by a limited liability company of which Mr. Rales is the sole member, 750,000 shares held by Colfax Capital Corporation, of which Mitchell P. Rales and Steven M. Rales are the sole stockholders,revocable trust, 19,388 shares held by Capital Yield Corporation, of which Mr. Mitchell P. Rales and Mr. Steven M. Rales are the sole stockholders, 854,750 shares held by the Mitchell P. Rales Family Trust, 11,500 shares held by a trust for his daughter, and 4,200 shares held as custodian for his daughters.daughters, and 1,440,000 tangible equity units (TEUs) that may be settled into shares of common stock by the holder at any time.The number of shares of common stock underlying Mr.  Mitchell P.Rales’ TEUs is based on the amount that may be acquired if the prepaid stock purchase contracts were settled prior to January 15, 2020. The actual number of shares the reporting person may acquire will depend on when the prepaid stock purchase contracts are settled. Mr. Mitchell Rales has sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 11,191,811 shares of common stock and the 1,440,000 TEUs, and shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 769,38819,388 shares of common stock. All of the securities held by the limited liability company of which Mr. Rales is the sole member, including its holdings7,000,000 shares of Colfax common stock are pledged to secure a line of credit. This entity and Mr. Mitchell Rales are in compliance with this line of credit. The business address of Mr. Mitchell P. Rales, and the limited liability company, is 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 800W, Washington, D.C. 20037-1701.11790 Glen Road, Potomac, MD 20854.
(2)	The amount shown and the following information is derived from a Schedule 13G/A filed February 14, 2019 by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (“Price Associates”), which sets forth Price Associates beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2018. According to the Schedule 13G/A, Price Associates has sole voting power over 4,643,372 shares and sole dispositive power over 13,988,736 shares. The business address of Price Associates is 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202.
(3)	Includes 9,999,9909,239,753 shares held by grantor retained annuity trusts, 750,000GRATs, 1,296,371 held by a revocable trust, 760,237 shares held by Colfax Capital Corporation,a family trust of which Mitchell P.Mr. Steven Rales andis the grantor, 375,000 shares owned by a charitable foundation of which Mr. Steven M. Rales areis the sole stockholders,director, and 19,388 shares held by Capital Yield Corporation, of which Mr. Mitchell P. Rales and Mr. Steven M. Rales are the sole stockholders. Mr. Steven M.Rales disclaims beneficial ownership of the 375,000 shares of common stock held by the charitable foundation. Mr. Steven Rales has sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 11,296,36110,911,124 shares of common stock, and shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 769,388779,625 shares of common stock. The business address of Steven M. Rales is 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 800W, Washington, D.C. 20037-1701.

(3) - 2019 Proxy Statement

49

Back to Contents

The(4)

BDTCP GP I, LLC (“BDTCP GP I”) is the general partner of four investment funds that received these shares in distributions from BDT CF Acquisition Vehicle, LLC (the “BDT Investor”), an affiliate of BDTCP GP I. Beneficial ownership amount shown and the following informationnature of ownership is derived from a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on February 23, 2015 by (i) BDT Capital Partners, LLC (“BDT CP”),CP, (ii) BDTCP GP I LLC (“BDTCP GP I”), (iii) Byron D. Trott, and (iv) BDTP GP, LLC (“BDTP”) and, from Forms 4 filed by Mr. Orr on June 16, 2015, and May 19, 2016.2016, and June 15, 2017, and from our internal records with respect to shares transferred by Mr. Orr following his retirement from our Board of Directors in 2018. Byron D. Trott is the sole member of BDTP, which is the managing member of BDT CP. BDT CP is the manager of BDTCP GP I. Certain investment funds (the “BDT Investment Funds”) controlled by BDTCP GP I directly beneficially own, in the aggregate, 10,614,968 shares, and an employee investment vehicle controlled by BDTP (the “BDT Investment Vehicle”) directlyBDTInvestor beneficially owns 436,203 shares. BDT CP disclaims beneficial ownership of the 436,203 shares owned by the BDT Investment Vehicle. Each of the BDT Investment Funds controlled by BDTCP GP I have sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to the shares of common stock beneficially owned by each of them. BDT CF Acquisition Vehicle, LLC (the “BDT Investment Vehicle”) directly beneficially owns 1,7033,707 shares transferred to it by Mr. Orr. The BDT Investment Vehicle has sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to351,422 shares of common stock beneficially owned by it.were distributed to certain beneficial owners affiliated with BDTCP GP I from BDTCP Investments 2009, LLC (“BDTCP 2009”) for estate and charitable planning purposes. BDTCP 2009 is an investment vehicle for employees of BDT CP and its affiliates. BDTCP 2009 received these shares in distributions from the BDT Investor. BDTP indirectly controls BDTCP 2009 and BDTCP GP I. The business address of BDT Capital Partners, LLC is 401 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 3100, Chicago, Illinois 60611.

- 2017 Proxy Statement	49

Back to Contents(5)

(4)	The amount shown and the following information is derived from a Schedule 13G/A filed February 15, 201714, 2019 by Principal Global Investors, LLC (“Principal”), which sets forth Principal’s beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2016.2018. According to the Schedule 13G/A, Price AssociatesPrincipal has shared voting and dispositive power over 8,189,2537,028,102 shares. The business address of Principal is 801 Grand Avenue, Des Moines, IA 50392.
(5)
(6)	The amount shown and the following information is derived from a Schedule 13G13G/A filed February 10, 201711, 2019 by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”), which sets forth Vanguard’s beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2016.2018. According to the Schedule 13G,13G/A, Vanguard has sole voting power over 58,80744,142 shares, shared voting power of 9,80010,700 shares, sole dispositive power over 6,540,9146,968,563 shares, and shared dispositive power over 63,50445,140 shares. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company (“VFTC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 34,440 shares or .02% of the Common Stock outstanding of the Company as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts. Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd. (“VIA”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 20,402 shares or .01% of the Common Stock outstanding of the Company as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings. The business address of Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.
(6)
(7)	Includes 83,64323,648 shares owned by the JWA GRAT #3, 90,895Irrevocable Trust #1, 61,130 shares held by the JWA GRAT #4, 24,72194,971 shares held by the JWA GRAT #5, 19,150 shares held by the JWA 2014 Trust, and 20,000 shares held by an irrevocable trust, of which Patrick Allender is a trustee. Mr. Allender disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares held by the JWA irrevocable trust, JWA GRATs, and the JWA 2014 Trust, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
(7)
(8)	Beneficial ownership by directors (other than Mitchell P. Rales) includes: (i) for each of Messrs. Allender and Gayner and Ms. Jordan, 26,45630,004 DRSUs or DSUs that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 22, 201726, 2019 and will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board and 14,88324,423 shares that such individuals have the right to acquire upon the exercise of director stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 22, 2017,26, 2019, (ii) for Mr. Perfall, 14,24417,792 DRSUs or DSUs that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 22, 201726, 2019 and will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board and 14,88324,423 shares that Mr. Perfall has the right to acquire upon the exercise of director stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 23, 2017, (iii)26, 2019 (iv) for Mr. Vinnakota, 11,71313,257 DRSUs or DSUs that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 22, 201726, 2019 and will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board and 14,88324,423 shares that Mr. Vinnakota has the right to acquire upon the exercise of director stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 22, 2017, (iv)26, 2019, (v) for Mr. Orr, 5,556Teirlinck, 3,826 DRSUs or DSUs that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 22, 201726, 2019 and will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board 2,004 DRSUs that will vest within 60 days of March 22, 2017, and 14,8835,302 shares that Mr. OrrTeirlinck has the right to acquire upon the exercise of director stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 22, 2017,26, 2019, (vi) for Ms. Wienbar, 7,252 DRSUs or DSUs that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 26, 2019 and (v)will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board and 9,540 shares that Ms. Wienbar has the right to acquire upon the exercise of director stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 26, 2019, and (vii) DSUs received in lieu of annual cash retainers and committee chairperson retainers that will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board as follows: Mr. Allender—18,322,23,887, Mr. Gayner— 14,749,19,463, Ms. Jordan— 16,501,22,066, Mr. Perfall— 11,115,16,982, Mr. Teirlinck— 3,405, and Ms. Wienbar— 845.5,559. For more information on these awards, see Director Compensation above.
(8)
(9)	Includes 18,010 shares held by a family trust, 6,5876,371 shares held by her spouse and 403619 shares held in a trust account for her spouse.
(9)(10)	Includes 7,447 shares held by a trust.
(10)
(11)	Beneficial ownership by named executive officers and our executive officers as a group includes shares that such individuals have the right to acquire upon the exercise of options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 22, 2017.26, 2019. The number of shares included in the table as beneficially owned which are subject to such options is as follows: Mr. Brannan— 44,785,Trerotola— 179,553, Mr. Hix— 163,050, Mr. Pryor— 151,217,474,588, Mr. Kambeyanda— 8,214, Ms. Puckett— 101,586, Ms. Clark— 70,309,72,067, Mr. Brander— 126,631, all of our current executive officers as a group— 533,331.1,015,889.
(11)	Mr. Brannan’s beneficial ownership includes 17,768 DRSUs or DSUs received for service on the Board prior to his appointment as an executive officer of the Company that will be delivered following the conclusion of his part-time service to the Company.
(12)	Includes 3,753 shares held by trusts for his daughter and granddaughters.
(13)	Includes 3000 shares held by trusts for his children and 1,1601,568 shares held in his 401(k) account.
(14)(13)	Includes 1,035 PRSUs2,626 RSUs that will vest within 60 days of March 22, 2017 and 1,11126, 2019.
(14)	Includes 905 shares held by herhis spouse.
(15)	Beneficial ownership for executive officers does not reflect PRSUs that have been earned but not yet vested or that will not vest within 60 days due to additional service-based vesting conditions. However, these PRSUs, when earned via certification of the applicable performance criteria by the Compensation Committee, are reflected in Table 1 of Form 4s filed by each executive officer. This transaction is shown in the Form 4 as an acquisition of the Company’s common stock pursuant to SEC guidance regarding Section 16 reporting for grants of restricted stock awards.

 

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	50

Back to Contents

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our equity securities. The Company’s Section 16 filing for its disposition of Circor Corporation shares in an underwritten offering on June 15, 2018 was disclosed via the Company’s press release and Circor Corporation filings atthat time and reported for Section 16 purposes on a Form 5 filed February 14, 2019. To our knowledge, based upon the reports filed and written representations regarding reports required during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2018, all other reports required by Section 16(a) were filed on a timely basis.

 

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	51

Back to Contents

GENERAL MATTERS

 

Outstanding Stock and Voting Rights

 

The Board has fixed the close of business on March 22, 201726, 2019 (the “Record Date”) as the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders of record on that date will be entitled to vote. Proxies will be voted as specified in the stockholder’s proxy. In the absence of specific instructions, proxies will be voted in accordance with the Company’s recommendations and in the discretion of the proxy holders on any other matter which properly comes before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. The Board has selected Mitchell P. Rales and Matthew L. Trerotola to act as proxies with full power of substitution.

 

Any stockholder of record giving a proxy has the power to revoke the proxy at any time before it is exercised by either (i) delivering a written notice of revocation to Colfax Corporation at 420 National Business Parkway, 5^thFloor, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701, Attn: Corporate Secretary, (ii) delivering prior to the Annual Meeting a properly executed and subsequently dated proxy, or (iii) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request. A beneficial stockholder who owns common stock in street name, meaning through a bank, broker or other nominee, should contact that entity to revoke a previously given proxy.

 

The Company will bear the total expense of this solicitation, including reimbursement paid to brokerage firms and others for their expenses in forwarding material regarding the Annual Meeting to beneficial owners. Solicitation of proxies may be made personally or by mail, telephone, Internet, e-mail or facsimile by officers and other management employees of the Company, who will receive no additional compensation for their services.

 

The holders of shares of the Company’s common stock are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, 122,989,141117,558,414 shares of the Company’s common stock were outstanding. Each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock entitles the holder to one vote on all matters brought before the Annual Meeting.

 

A list of stockholders of record as of the Record Date will be available for inspection during ordinary business hours at our corporate headquarters located at 420 National Business Parkway, 5^thFloor, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701, for 10 days prior to the date of our Annual Meeting. The list will also be available for inspection at the Annual Meeting.

 

The quorum necessary to conduct business at the Annual Meeting consists of a majority of the shares of the Company’s stock outstanding on the Record Date and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, either present in person or represented by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes (described below) are counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum. In accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (theBylaws(the “Bylaws”), to be elected each director nominee must receive a majority of the votes cast with respect to that director’s election. Incumbent directors nominated for election by the Board are required, as a condition to such nomination, to submit a conditional letter of resignation to the Chairman of the Board. In the event that a nominee for director does not receive a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting with respect to his or her election, the Board will promptly consider whether to accept or reject the conditional resignation of that nominee, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will then take action and will publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it no later than 90 days following the certification of election results.

 

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required for the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20162019 and for the approval of the advisory vote onapproving the compensation of our named executive officers.

For the advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers, the affirmation vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is the applicable approval standard for any of the affirmative alternatives (“EVERY THREE YEARS”, “EVERY TWO YEARS”, “EVERY YEAR”). Since stockholders are being given several voting choices, it is possible that no single choice will receive a majority vote. In light of the foregoing, the Board will consider the outcome of this vote when determining the frequency of holding future advisory votes on our executive compensation.

 

Abstentions will have no effect on the election of directors but will have the same effect as a vote against the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP or the approval of the advisory vote onapproving the compensation of our named executive officers. For the advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on our executive compensation, abstentions will have the effect of a vote not in support of any frequency alternative.

 

Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), on the ratification of the selection of our registered public accounting firm, brokerage firms may vote in their discretion on behalf of clients who have not furnished voting instructions.instructions on the ratification of the selection of our registered public accounting firm. In contrast, the remaining proposals are “non-discretionary”“non-routine” items. This means brokerage firms that have not received voting instructions from their clients on this matter may not vote on these proposals (a “broker non-vote”). Broker non-votes will not be considered in determining the number of votes necessary for election and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote for the election of directors. Further, broker non-votes will have no effect on the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers and on the advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory vote onto approve the compensation of our named executive officers.

 

Only stockholders as of the Record Date are entitled to attend the Annual Meeting in person. The names of stockholders of record will be on a list at the Annual Meeting and such stockholders may gain entry with a government-issued photo identification,

- 2017 Proxy Statement	52

Back to Contents

such as a driver’s license, state-issued ID card, or passport. Beneficial stockholders who own common stock in street name, meaning through a bank, broker or other nominee, must present a government-issued photo identification and proof of beneficial stock ownership as of the Record Date (such as the Notice of Internet Availability, a copy of the proxy card received if one was sent to the stockholder or an account statement or other similar evidence showing stock ownership as of the Record Date) in order to gain entry to the Annual Meeting. Representatives of an entity that owns stock of the Company must present government-issued photo identification, evidence that they are the entity’s authorized

- 2019 Proxy Statement

52

Back to Contents

representative or proxyholder and, if the entity is a beneficial owner, proof of the entity’s beneficial stockownership as of the Record Date. A person who is not a stockholder will be entitled to admission only if he or she presents a valid legal proxy from a stockholder of record and government-issued photo identification. Eachstockholder may appoint only one proxy holder or representative to attend the meeting on his or her behalf.

 

Please note that the use of cameras (including cell phones with photographic capabilities), recording devices and other electronic devices is strictly prohibited at the meeting.

 

Stockholder Proposals and Nominations

 

Requirements for Stockholder Proposals to be Considered for Inclusion in our Proxy Materials.To be considered for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, stockholder proposals must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no later than the close of business on December 5, 2017.4, 2019.

 

Requirements for Stockholder Proposals to be Brought Before an Annual Meeting and Exclusive Forum.Meeting.Our Bylaws provide that, for a stockholder to nominate a candidate for election to the Board or propose any other business to be considered at an annual meeting other than through a proposal presented pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, the stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary of the Company at Colfax Corporation, 420 National Business Parkway, 5^thFloor, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701, Attn: Corporate Secretary. To be timely for an annual meeting, the stockholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received by the Secretary not less than the close of business 90 days nor more than 120 days before the anniversary date of the preceding annual meeting; accordingly, for the 20172019 annual meeting, notice must be delivered to or mailed and received by the Secretary no later than the close of business on February 17, 201813, 2020 and no earlier than January 18, 2017.14, 2020. However, if the annual meeting is set for a datethat is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after such anniversary, the Company must receive the notice not earlier than the close of business on the 120^thday prior to the annual meeting date and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90^thday prior to such annual meeting or the tenth day following the day when the Company makes a public announcement of the annual meeting date. Such notice must provide the information required by Section 2.2 of our Bylaws with respect to each matter, other than stockholder nominations of directors, that the stockholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting. Notice of stockholder nominations must provide the information required by Section 3.3 of our Bylaws. Both Section 2.2 and Section 3.3 of our Bylaws mandate certain additional information to be provided by a stockholder who wishes to introduce business or nominate a director candidate. The chairman of the annual meeting may refuse to acknowledge or introduce any nomination or proposal if notice thereof is not received within the applicable deadlines or does not otherwise comply with our Bylaws. If the stockholder does not provide notice of a nomination or proposal within the applicable deadlines or does not comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-4(c) under the Exchange Act, we may exercise discretionary voting authority under proxies that we solicit to vote in accordance with our best judgment on any such nomination or proposal.

 

Other Bylaw Provisions

Article 8 of our Bylaws provides that unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware does not have jurisdiction, another state court located within the State of Delaware or the federal district court for the District of Delaware) will be the sole and exclusive forum for (a) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Company, (b) any action asserting a claim of breach of fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer, employee or stockholder of the Company to the Company or the Company’s stockholders, (c) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law or the Company’s certificate of incorporation or Bylaws, (d) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine, or (e) any other action asserting an internal corporate claim as defined in Section 115 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Article 8 is designed to save the Company and its stockholders from the increased expense of defending against duplicative litigation brought in multiple courts, and also to provide that claims involving Delaware law are decided by Delaware courts.

- 2017 Proxy Statement	53

Back to Contents

Delivery of Documents to Stockholders Sharing an Address

 

SEC rules permit the delivery of a single copy of a company’s annual report and proxy statement, or notice of internet availability of proxy materials, as applicable, to any household at which two or more stockholders reside if they appear to be members of the same family. This procedure, referred to as householding, reduces the volume of duplicate information stockholders receive and reduces mailing and printing expenses.

 

The broker, bank or other nominee for any stockholder who is a beneficial owner of the Company’s stock may deliver only one copy of the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders and Proxy Statement, or the Company’s Notice, as applicable, to multiple stockholders who share the same address, unless that broker, bank or other nominee has received contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders. We will deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the Company’s AnnualReport to Stockholders and Proxy Statement, or the Company’s Notice, as applicable, to any stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered. A stockholder who wishes to receive a separate copy of the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders and Proxy Statement, or the Company’s Notice, as applicable, now or in the future, should submit a written request to Investor Relations, Colfax Corporation, 420 National Business Parkway, 5^thFloor, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701 or call (301) 323-9000 and ask for Investor Relations. Beneficial owners sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders and Proxy Statement, or the Company’s Notice, as applicable, and wish to receive a single copy of such materials in the future will need to contact their broker, bank or other nominee to request that only a single copy of each document be mailed to all stockholders at the shared address in the future.

 

- 2019 Proxy Statement

53

Back to Contents

Additional Information

 

A copy of the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162018 has been made available concurrently with this Proxy Statement to all stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. The Annual Report is not incorporated into this Proxy Statement and is not considered proxy-soliciting material.

 

The Company filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K with the SEC on February 14, 2017.21, 2019. The Company will mail without charge, upon written request, a copy of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2018, including financial statements but excluding exhibits. Exhibits, if requested, will be furnished upon the payment of a fee determined by the Company, such fee to be limited to the Company’s reasonable expenses in furnishing the requested exhibit or exhibits. Please send a written request to Investor Relations, Colfax Corporation, 420 National Business Parkway, 5^thFloor, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701, or access these materials on the Company’s website atwww.colfaxcorp.comon the Investors page.

 

Other Matters

 

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board does not intend to present any matters other than those described herein at the Annual Meeting and is unaware of any matters to be presented by other parties. If other matters are properly brought before the meeting for action by the stockholders, proxies returned to us will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board or, in the absence of such a recommendation, in accordance with the judgment of the proxy holder.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

A. Lynne PuckettCurtis E. Jewell

Secretary

 

- 20172019 Proxy Statement	54

Back to Contents

Back to Contents